Those that Choose Not. To Ascend

Those who Choose not to Ascend will Feel that Nothing has Changed

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

For those unaware, it’ll appear as if nothing has changed


I’m producing a book on the fate of the dark, which will be published in parts.

What will it look like to those who choose not to ascend?

Archangel Michael: People will disappear. It will not be cause for trauma or mayhem. It will not be the same grieving as someone in the physical realm dying. It will just be a slight shift in the case of friends. But, in the case of husbands and wives, parents and children, there would be a knowing. (1)

(Archangel Michael, Personal Reading with Steve Beckow through Linda Dillon on Sept. 13, 2011.)

So, for example, let me give you a practical example. There are times when many of you have an impression of my presence in your room. Some of you see bright blue. Some of you feel an etheric shadow. Some of you see the fullness of my being. Some of you simply sense me. But you are not getting the full impression, or the might of my physical presence standing in front of you – well, a few of you are, but not consistently and not day to day to day.

So it will be with those who have ascended to those who are remaining on the longer timeline of the 3rd dimensional reality, who are choosing to ascend, not to relocate – let us be very clear about that. So they will have a sense of you that is as real to them as I am to you. Will it be the fullness of you? No. But it will most certainly be enough. …

The few – and I emphasize, because our plan, and we do not give up – is that everybody goes, everybody – but if there are a few who, by free will, free choice, choose to relocate elsewhere, they will feel and think that nothing much has changed.

There will be an explanation of where you have gone or not gone. There will be a sense of that imprint of who you are. But they will continue in an illusion which has been very dense and very thick for them regardless.

So it will not be heart-breaking; it will be taken care of. For this is not in any of these scenarios a cruel, unfeeling, punishing process. This is an upliftment. This is the miraculous unfoldment.

So even for those who choose not to engage at all, it will not be painful and harmful. And they will be given their opportunity also to progress as they choose. And the only thing we say, there is a window there. So we are not talking about 20,000 years. We are talking a window for them to decide to come and join in this miraculous process. (2)

Will they be aware of what’s happening?

Saul: A few who have demonstrably shown that they will not surrender to God’s Love will remain unaware, because they have chosen for the time being to dissociate themselves from the truth as they attempt to maintain and even strengthen the illusory environment that has seemed to hold you enslaved for so long.

Eventually, the realization of the insanity of attempting to maintain this enclosed, shut down, incredibly limiting and hostile environment will seep into their consciousness, and then they too will seek out God’s loving embrace. Until they make that choice they will be able to continue as if nothing had changed – unaware of the joy into which the vast majority of humanity has surrendered. (3)

SaLuSa: Now there still will be those unfortunately, (or fortunately for they are doing what they wish, although it is not my desire), that will choose to continue on in this type of a reality, of the third as you could think of it as … and they will be shifted to an alternate situation. The people, … say who are sitting there, may blink and not even remember … or have dim sense, ‘I wonder where so and so went? (4)

Mike Quinsey’s Higher Self: It would not be in the interests of those whose vibrations have not been lifted to try and find a place in Ascension as, even if they could somehow do so, it would be a very uncomfortable experience. Their timeline will continue to progress in a new cycle in another direction that will eventually offer them a further opportunity to achieve Ascension. A soul’s evolution is ongoing and planned to eventually ensure success. (5)


(1) Archangel Michael in a personal reading with Steve Beckow through Linda Dillon, Sept. 13, 2011.

(2) “Archangel Michael: This Election Clears the Way for Obama to Step into the Truth of His Being,” Nov. 8, 2012, at Yes but .

(3) Saul, Aug. 26, 2012, at

(4) SaLuSa, Sept. 2, 2011, at .

(5) Mike Quinsey’s Higher-Self Message, Sept. 1, 2017.


Facebook Encounters Australian Resistance



Facebook Encounters Australian Resistance

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

Thanks to Stephen.

‘Send them packing’: Facebook is told it can leave Australia if it refuses to abide by our laws and pay for news content – as Mark ‘Jong-Un’ Zuckerberg is compared to North Korean dictator

Charlie Moore, Daily Mail, Feb. 18, 2021


Facebook should be ‘sent-packing’ from Australia for stifling free speech after it banned news content, according to Nationals Senator Matt Canavan.

The US based social media company blocked Australian users from seeing and sharing local news in response to a new law to make tech giants pay media companies for the content they use.

Facebook’s move contrasted with Google, which in recent days has brokered deals with media groups, including Rupert Murdoch’s News Corp.

The drastic move by Facebook has stopped Australians from accessing vital information in the middle of the coronavirus pandemic, with even government and political party pages also caught up in the ban.

When users go on reliable Facebook news accounts, including the ABC, 7News and Daily Mail Australia, they are met with a message saying there are ‘no posts’ available – hiding news content which is visible to those overseas.

Even the Australian Greens Facebook page, as well as the Bureau of Meteorology and domestic violence charities, was also banned from posting updates – even though the party is not a news organisation.

Nationals Senator Matt Canavan said he did not agree with this stifling of free speech.

‘We already have laws that stop foreigners interfering in political debates. Facebook at least appears to be acting against the spirit of those laws,’ he told Daily Mail Australia.

‘Any overseas companies that try to unduly control the free speech of Australians should be sent packing.’

The strong words come as Treasurer Josh Frydenberg slammed Facebook’s actions as ‘unnecessary and wrong’.

‘They were heavy handed,’ he said on Thursday afternoon, ‘and they will damage its reputation here in Australia’.

Former Deputy Prime Minister Barnaby Joyce said Mark Zuckerberg is behaving like North Korean dictator Kim Jong-un.

Mr Joyce said the decision meant Facebook resembled North Korea which tightly controls which news and information its citizens can access and relentlessly publishes propaganda supporting the leadership.

‘Journalism is essential for the functioning of democracy. If you don’t want journalism then go to North Korea,’ he told Daily Mail Australia.

‘This is a North Korean policy agency being pursued by Facebook,’ he added.

Mr Joyce said the government should consider issuing licences that grant permission for social media companies to operate in Australia to make sure they act in the national interest.

‘If they leave then so what? Another platform will be set up,’ he said.

Mr Joyce added: ‘When I look up at the press gallery in Parliament or when I walk around Tamworth, I don’t see a Facebook bureau or a Google bureau – so if they want to benefit from journalism done by others then they need to pay for it.

‘It took 10,000 years of human experience to gain the liberties we enjoy today and the investigatory endeavours of paid journalists is a crucial pillar of that. To have journalism you need real presence and advertising.

‘If Facebook wants to embezzle the process they can return to their garage and table tennis.’

Nationals MP Barnaby Joyce (pictured) called on the federal government to consider issuing licences that grant permission for social media companies to operate in Australia

Nationals MP Barnaby Joyce (pictured) called on the federal government to consider issuing licences that grant permission for social media companies to operate in Australia

Minister for Health Greg Hunt said slammed the social media giant for denying Australians access to fundamental health, mental health and vaccination information.

‘Facebook has taken steps, which are unprecedented and reprehensible,’ he said.

‘Unacceptable in a democracy such as this and an abuse of their power.’

Minister for Agriculture David Littleproud was adamant the government would fight back against Facebook.

‘But let many say this: The Australian people and its government will not be bullied by some big tech company that is putting people as lives at risk and putting profits ahead of people,’ he said.

Communications Minister Paul Fletcher (pictured) insists the government 'will be proceeding' with the new law which sparked the Facebook ban

Communications Minister Paul Fletcher (pictured) insists the government ‘will be proceeding’ with the new law which sparked the Facebook ban

Communications Minister Paul Fletcher has insisted the government will not back down and said the publisher could either abide by Australia’s laws or leave the country.

Mr Fletcher said the government ‘will be proceeding’ with the new law, which passed the House of Representatives on Wednesday night and looks set to pass the Senate within days.

‘We want Google and Facebook to stay in Australia but we have been very clear that if you do business in Australia, you need to comply with the laws passed by the elected Parliament of this nation,’ he told the ABC on Thursday morning.

But Mr Fletcher didn’t rule out tweaking the code after continuing discussions with Facebook.

Treasurer Josh Treasurer spoke to CEO Mark Zuckerberg on Thursday morning and revealed the pair were trying to find ‘a path forward’.

‘Let’s allow those discussions to continue and, at the same time, let’s continue with the process of legislating the code,’ Mr Fletcher said.

Facebook’s decision means its nine million daily users in Australia can no longer view any news – even from foreign websites.

Australian Facebook users can’t even share content they find interesting with friends and family, and those overseas can’t read or access any content from Down Under eithe.


Top Journalists expose Major Cover-ups by MassMedia

Top Journalists Expose Major Cover-ups in Mass Media

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

Fred Burks

In the course of researching another article, I came across this piece from Fred Burks, which really deserves reposting. Long.

Top Journalists Expose Major Cover-ups in Mass Media

by Fred Burks

(This is an expansion of the article, “Litany of Media Cover-ups,” to be found on this site at

The riveting excerpts below from the revealing accounts of 20 award-winning journalists in the highly acclaimed book Into the Buzzsaw are essential reading for all who support democracy. These courageous writers were prevented by corporate ownership of the mass media from reporting major news stories. Some were even fired. They have won numerous awards, including several Emmys and a Pulitzer. Help build a brighter future by spreading this news.

Jane Akre spent 20 years as a network and local TV reporter for news and mass media operations throughout the country. She and her husband, investigative reporter Steve Wilson, were awarded the Goldman Environmental Prize for their struggle with the story told in this chapter.

By February 1997 our story was ready to air. It attempted to answer some troubling questions: Why had Monsanto sued two small dairies to prevent them from labeling their milk as coming from cows not injected with [growth hormone rBGH]? Why had two Canadian health regulators claimed that their jobs were threatened – and then said Monsanto offered them a bribe to give fast-track approval to the drug? Why did Florida supermarkets break their much-publicized promise that milk in the dairy case would not come from hormone-treated cows? And why was the US the only major industrialized nation to approve this controversial genetically engineered hormone? (p. 211)

Station managers were so proud of our work that they saturated virtually every Tampa Bay radio station with thousands of dollars’ worth of ads urging viewers to watch what we’d uncovered about “The Mystery in Your Milk.” But then, our Fox managers’ pride turned to panic. [Monsanto lawyer] John Walsh wrote that some points of the story “clearly contain the elements of defamatory statements which, if repeated in a broadcast, could lead to serious damage to Monsanto and dire consequences for Fox News.” (pp. 211-213)

It was not long after our [unsuccessful] struggle to air an honest report had begun that Fox fired both the news director and the general manager. The new general manager, Dave Boylan, explained that if we didn’t agree to changes that Monsanto and Fox lawyers were insisting upon, we’d be fired for insubordination within 48 hours. We pleaded with Dave to look at the facts we’d uncovered, many of which conclusively disproved Monsanto’s claims. We reminded him of the importance of the facts about a basic food most of our viewers consume and feed to their children daily. His reply: “We paid $3 billion dollars for these TV stations. We’ll tell you what the news is. The news is what we say it is!” Steve [the author’s husband and coworker] was firm but respectful when he made it clear we would neither lie nor distort any part of the story. (pp. 213-215)

[The Dairy Coalition’s director] took great pride in bragging that the Coalition “snowed the station with paperwork and pressure to have the story killed.” Fox threatened our job every time we resisted the dozens of changes that would sanitize the story and fill it with lies and distortions. [Fox lawyer] Forest finally leveled with us. “You guys don’t get it. It doesn’t matter whether the facts are true. This story isn’t worth a couple of hundred thousand dollars to go up against Monsanto.” (pp. 217, 218)

Fox’s general manager presented us with an agreement that would give us a full year of salaries and benefits worth $200,000 in no-show “consulting jobs,” but with strings attached: no mention of how Fox covered up the story and no opportunity to ever expose the facts Fox refused to air. We turned down this second hush money offer. We were both finally fired, allegedly for “no cause.” (p. 219)

The controversy over rBGH has traveled recently to Canada and the European Union, both of which decided to reject the drug for use in those countries. (p. 236)

For a revealing 10-minute video clip of this astounding case, click here. For updates on their lawsuit, see the Ms. Akre and Mr. Wilson’s website at

Dan Rather [was] the anchor and managing editor of CBS Evening News and correspondent for 60 Minutes II. In his more than 30 years at CBS, he received almost every honor in broadcast journalism, including several Emmy Awards, a Peabody Award, and citations from scholarly, professional, and charitable organizations. This is an excerpt from an interview originally aired on BBC Newsnight on May 16, 2002.

Access was extremely limited to the press during the time of September 11th, and ever since then [has been] limited in a way that is unprecedented in American journalism. There was a full understanding of why access was so limited during that time. [However] in the weeks and months that followed September 11th, the federal government began to take an unprecedented attitude about the access of American journalists to the war. What’s particularly troubling is that what’s being done is in direct variance with the Pentagon’s stated policy [of] maximum access and maximum information consistent with national security. What’s going on is a belief that you can manipulate communicable trust between the leadership and the led. The way you do that is you don’t let the press in anywhere (p. 36-38).

Access to the [Iraq] war is extremely limited. The fiercer the combat, the more the access is limited, [including] access to information. I would say that overwhelmingly the limiting of access to information has much more to do with the determination to be seen as conducting the war errorlessly than it does with any sense of national security (p. 40).

None of us in journalism have asked questions strongly enough about limiting access and information for reasons other than national security. It’s unpatriotic not to ask questions. Anybody in American journalism who tells you that he or she has not felt this pressure [not to ask tough questions] is either kidding themselves or trying to deceive you (p. 39-40)

What we’re talking about here is a form of self-censorship. Self-censorship is a real and present danger to journalists at every level and on a lot of different kinds of stories. Before the war, before September 11th, fear ruled every newsroom in the country in some important ways – fear if we don’t dumb it down, if we don’t tart it up, if we don’t go to the trivial at the expense of the important, we’re not going to be publishing a newspaper or magazine. We’re not going to be on the air. The ratings will eat us up. (p. 41-42).

There was a time in South Africa when people would put flaming tires around people’s necks if they dissented. In some ways the fear [now in the U.S.] is that you’ll have a flaming tire of lack of patriotism put around your neck. It’s that fear that keeps journalists from asking the tough questions. And I am humbled to say, I do not except myself from this criticism (p. 42).

For a BBC press release of this May 16, 2002 interview, click here.

Monika Jensen-Stevenson is a former Emmy-winning producer for 60 Minutes. The Vietnam Veterans Coalition awarded her the Vietnam Veterans National Medal.

Marine Private Robert R. Garwood – fourteen years a prisoner of the communist Vietnamese – was found guilty of collaboration with the enemy in the longest court-martial in United States history. I first heard of Garwood in 1979. Wire reports referred to him as a defector whom the US government was charging with being a traitor. At the end of the court-martial, there seemed no question that Garwood was a monstrous traitor. (pp. 255, 256)

In 1985, Garwood was speaking publicly about something that had never made the news during his court-martial. The Wall Street Journal reported he said that he knew firsthand of other American prisoners in Vietnam long after the war was over. He was supported by Vietnam combat veterans whose war records were impeccable. These veterans told a story vastly different from what was made public during the court-martial and one that was intimately tied to another 60 Minutes story I was working on – “Dead or Alive?” The title referred to Vietnam POW/MIAs [Prisoners Of War/Missing In Action]. (p. 256)

My sources included outstanding experts like former head of the Defense Intelligence Agency General Eugene Tighe and returned POWs like Captain Red McDaniel, who held the Navy’s top award for bravery, had commanded the aircraft carrier Lexington, and was director of liaison on Capitol Hill for the Navy and Marine Corps. With such advocates providing back up, it was hard not to consider the possibility that prisoners (some 3,500) had in fact been kept by the Vietnamese communists as hostages to make sure the US would pay the more than $3 billion in war reparations that Nixon had promised before his fall from grace. Particularly compelling was the fact that of the 300 prisoners known to be held in Laos, not one was released for homecoming in 1973. (p. 256)

Initially held back to ensure the US would fulfill its secret promise to pay reparation monies, by 1979 American POWs had become worthless pawns. The US had not paid the promised monies and had no intention of paying in the future. (p. 263)

Ms. Jensen-Stevenson’s book on this topic, Kiss the Boys Goodbye, is available at

Kristina Borjesson has been an independent producer and writer for almost 20 years. Among her many accomplishments besides editing this volume, she worked at CBS network where she won an Emmy and a Murrow Award for her investigative reporting on “CBS Reports: Legacy of Shame” with Dan Rather and Randall Pinkston.

You don’t choose to have the kind of experience I had while trying to report on the demise of TWA Flight 800. You fall into it. At CBS, I’d recently picked up an Emmy for investigative reporting when I was assigned to investigate the crash. I had no idea that my life would be turned upside down and inside out – that I’d be assigned to walk into what I now call “the buzzsaw.” (p. 284)

The buzzsaw is what can rip through you when you try to investigate or expose anything this country’s large institutions – be they corporate or government – want kept under wraps. The system fights back with official lies, disinformation, and stonewalling. Your phone starts acting funny. Strange people call you at strange hours to give you strange information. The FBI calls you. Your car is broken into and the thief takes your computer and your reporter’s notebook and leaves everything else behind. You feel like you’re being followed everywhere you go. (p. 284)

Pierre Salinger announced to the world on November 8, 1996, that he’d received documents from French intelligence proving that a US Navy missile had accidentally downed [TWA Flight 800]. That same day, FBI’s Jim Kallstrom called a press conference to deny Salinger’s allegations. [At the press conference,] Kallstrom rattled off a prepared speech, and then it was time for questions. A man raised his hand and asked why the Navy was involved in the recovery and investigation while a possible suspect. Kallstrom’s response was immediate; “Remove him!” he yelled. Two men leapt over to the questioner and grabbed him by the arms. There was a momentary chill in the air after the guy had been dragged out of the room. Kallstrom acted as if nothing had happened. (pp. 290, 291)

A few weeks after the FBI’s visit to CBS, I received my walking papers. Law enforcement consultant Paul Ragonese eventually got his walking papers, too. Ragonese was replaced by none other than the FBI’s TWA 800 task force chief, James Kallstrom. (p. 307)

Ms. Borjesson compiled Into the Buzzsaw, the book from which this summary as made.

Greg Palast writes for the Guardian and Observer newspapers of London and reports for the BBC’s Newsnight. Palast abandoned hopes of working in America when mainstream press failed to report on his groundbreaking exposes known for stripping bare abuses.

In the months leading up to the November [2000] balloting, Florida Governor Jeb Bush and his secretary of state, Katherine Harris, ordered local elections supervisors to purge 58,000 voters from registries on the grounds they were felons not entitled to vote in Florida. As it turns out, only a handful of these voters were felons. The voters were [about 54%] African Americans, and most of the others were white and Hispanic Democrats. [Several] weeks after the election, this extraordinary news ran on page one of the country’s leading paper. Unfortunately, it was in the wrong country: Britain. In the USA, it was not covered. It was given big network TV coverage. But again, it was on the wrong continent – on BBC TV, London. (pp. 195, 196)

The office of the governor [also] illegally ordered the removal of felons from the voter rolls – real felons – but with the right to vote under Florida law. As a result, 50,000 of these voters could not vote. The fact that 90% of these voters were Democrats should have made it news because this maneuver alone more than accounted for Bush’s victory. (pp. 197-200)

In February 2001, I took my BBC film crew to Florida, having unearthed a page marked “secret” and “confidential” from the company the state had hired to make up the list of names to purge from voter rolls. I took my camera crew into an agreed interview with Jeb Bush’s director of the Department of Elections. When I pulled out the confidential sheet, Bush’s man ripped off the microphone and did the fifty-yard dash, locking himself in his office, all in front of our cameras. It was killer television and wowed the British viewers. We even ran a confession from the company. Newsworthy for the USA? Apparently not. (pp. 202, 203)

A group of well-placed sources told my BBC team that before Sept. 11th the US government had turned away evidence of Saudi billionaires funding bin Laden’s network. We got our hands on documents that backed up the story that FBI and CIA investigations had been slowed by the Clinton administration, then killed by Bush Jr.’s. The story made top of the news – in Britain. In the US, one TV reporter picked up the report. He was called, he says, by network chiefs, and told to go no further. He didn’t. (p. 205)

For Mr. Palast’s website, see

Michael Levine is a 25-year veteran of the DEA turned best-selling author and journalist. His articles and interviews on the drug war have been published in numerous national newspapers and magazines, including the New York Times, Los Angeles Times, USA Today, and Esquire.

When Nixon first declared war on drugs in 1971, there were fewer than 500,000 hard-core addicts in the nation, most of whom were addicted to heroin. Three decades later, despite the expenditure of $1 trillion in tax dollars, the number of hard-core addicts is shortly expected to exceed five million. Our nation has become the supermarket of the drug world, with a wider variety and bigger supply of drugs at cheaper prices than ever before. The problem now not only affects every town on the map, but it is difficult to find a family anywhere that is not somehow affected. (pp. 158, 159)

The Chang Mai factory the CIA prevented me from destroying was the source of massive amounts of heroin being smuggled into the US in the bodies and body bags of GIs killed in Vietnam. (p. 165)

My unit, the Hard Narcotics Smuggling Squad, was charged with investigating all heroin and cocaine smuggling through the Port of New York. My unit became involved in investigating every major smuggling operation known to law enforcement. We could not avoid witnessing the CIA protecting major drug dealers. Not a single important source in Southeast Asia was ever indicted by US law enforcement. This was no accident. Case after case was killed by CIA and State Department intervention and there wasn’t a damned thing we could do about it. CIA-owned airlines like Air America were being used to ferry drugs throughout Southeast Asia, allegedly to support our “allies.” CIA banking operations were used to launder drug money. (pp. 165, 166)

In 1972, I was assigned to assist in a major international drug case involving top Panamanian government officials who were using diplomatic passports to smuggle large quantities of heroin and other drugs into the US. The name Manuel Noriega surfaced prominently in the investigation. Surfacing right behind Noriega was the CIA to protect him from US law enforcement. As head of the CIA, Bush authorized a salary for Manuel Noriega as a CIA asset, while the dictator was listed in as many as 40 DEA computer files as a drug dealer. (pp. 166, 167)

The CIA and the Department of State were protecting more and more politically powerful drug traffickers around the world: the Mujihadeen in Afghanistan, the Bolivian cocaine cartels, the top levels of Mexican government, Nicaraguan Contras, Colombian drug dealers and politicians, and others. Media’s duties, as I experienced firsthand, were twofold: first, to keep quiet about the gush of drugs that was allowed to flow unimpeded into the US; second, to divert the public’s attention by shilling them into believing the drug war was legitimate by falsely presenting the few trickles we were permitted to indict as though they were major “victories,” when in fact we were doing nothing more than getting rid of the inefficient competitors of CIA assets. (pp. 166, 167)

On July 17, 1980, drug traffickers actually took control of a nation. Bolivia at the time [was] the source of virtually 100% of the cocaine entering the US. CIA-recruited mercenaries and drug traffickers unseated Bolivia’s democratically elected president, a leftist whom the US government didn’t want in power. Immediately after the coup, cocaine production increased massively, until it soon outstripped supply. This was the true beginning of the crack “plague.” (pp. 167, 168)

The CIA along with the State and Justice Departments had to combine forces to protect their drug-dealing assets by destroying a DEA investigation. How do I know? I was the inside source. I sat down at my desk in the American embassy and wrote the kind of letter that I never myself imagined ever writing. I detailed three pages typewritten on official US embassy stationary—enough evidence of my charges to feed a wolf pack of investigative journalists. I also expressed my willingness to be a quotable source. I addressed it directly to Strasser and Rohter, care of Newsweek. Two sleepless weeks later, I was still sitting in my embassy office staring at the phone. Three weeks later, it rang. It was DEA’s internal security. They were calling me to notify me that I was under investigation. I had been falsely accused of everything from black-marketing to having sex with a married female DEA agent. The investigation would wreak havoc with my life for the next four years. (pp. 168-171)

In one glaring case, an associate of mine was sent into Honduras to open a DEA office in Tegucigalpa. Within months he had documented as much as 50 tons of cocaine being smuggled into the US by Honduran military people who were supporting the Contras. This was enough cocaine to fill a third of US demand. What was the DEA response? They closed the office. (p. 175)

Sometime in 1990, US Customs intercepted a ton of cocaine being smuggled through Miami International Airport. A Customs and DEA investigation quickly revealed that the smugglers were the Venezuelan National Guard headed by General Guillen, a CIA “asset” who claimed that he had been operating under CIA orders and protection. The CIA soon admitted that this was true. If the CIA is good at anything, it is the complete control of American mass media. So secure are they in their ability to manipulate the mass media that they even brag about it in their own in-house memos. The New York Times had the story almost immediately in 1990 and did not print it until 1993. It finally became news that was “fit to print” when the Times learned that 60 Minutes also had the story and was actually going to run it. The highlight of the 60 Minutes piece is when the administrator of the DEA, Federal Judge Robert Bonner, tells Mike Wallace, “There is no other way to put it, Mike, [what the CIA did] is drug smuggling. It’s illegal [author’s emphasis].” (pp. 188, 189)

The fact is – and you can read it yourself in the federal court records – that seven months before the attempt to blow up the World Trade Center in 1993, the FBI had a paid informant, Emad Salem, who had infiltrated the bombers and had told the FBI of their plans to blow up the twin towers. Without notifying the NYPD or anyone else, an FBI supervisor “fired” Salem, who was making $500 a week for his work. After the bomb went off, the FBI hired Salem back and paid him $1.5 million to help them track down the bombers. But that’s not all the FBI missed. When they finally did catch the actual bomber, Ramzi Yousef (a man trained with CIA funds during the Russia-Afghanistan war), the FBI found information on his personal computer about plans to use hijacked American jetliners as fuel-laden missiles. The FBI ignored this information, too. (p. 191)

GLearn about Mr. Levine’s books and radio show at

Gary Webb
was an investigative reporter for 19 years. He was one of six reporters to win a 1990 Pulitzer Prize for reporting on northern California’s 1989 earthquake. He also received the 1997 Media Hero award, and in 1996 was named Journalist of the Year by the Bay Area Society of Professional Journalists. He worked on several newspapers until being forced out of his job after the San Jose Mercury News retracted their support for the Dark Alliance story discussed below.

In 1996, I wrote a series of stories, entitled Dark Alliance, that began this way: For the better part of a decade, a Bay Area drug ring sold tons of cocaine to the Crips and Bloods street gangs of LA and funneled millions in drug profits to a Latin American guerilla army run by the CIA. The cocaine that flooded in helped spark a crack explosion in urban America. It is one of the most bizarre alliances in modern history – the union of a US-backed army attempting to overthrow a socialist government and the Uzi-toting “gangstas” of Los Angeles. (p. 143)

In December 1995, I wrote a lengthy memo to my editors, advising them of what my Nicaraguan colleague and I had found: With the help of recently declassified documents, FBI reports, DEA undercover tapes, as well as interviews with some of the key participants, we will show how a CIA-linked drug and stolen car network provided weapons and tons of high-grade, dirt cheap cocaine to the very person who spread crack through LA and from there into the hinterlands. A bizarre bond between an elusive CIA operative and a brilliant car thief from LA’s ghettos touched off a social phenomenon – crack and gang-power – that changed our lives. The day these two men met was literally ground zero for California’s crack explosion. This is also the story of how an ill-planned foreign policy adventure – the CIA’s “secret” war in Nicaragua – boomeranged back to the streets of America, in the long run doing more damage to us than to our “enemies” in Central America. We have compelling evidence that the kingpins of this cocaine ring enjoyed a unique relationship with the US government that has continued to this day. (pp. 145-146)

The story was developing a political momentum all of its own, and it was happening despite a virtual news blackout from the mass media. Ultimately, it was public pressure that forced the national newspapers into the fray. In Washington, black media outlets were ridiculing the Post for its silence. [In] October and November, the Washington Post, New York Times, and Los Angeles Times published lengthy stories about the CIA drug issue, but spent precious little time exploring the CIA’s activities. Instead, my reporting and I became the focus of their scrutiny. The official conclusion reached by all three papers: Much ado about nothing. No story here. The series was “flawed.” It was remarkable [Mercury News editor] Ceppos, wrote, that the four Post reporters assigned to debunk the series “could not find a single significant factual error.” (pp. 149-152)

At my editor’s request, I wrote another series following up on the first three parts: a package of four stories to run over two days. They never began to edit them. Instead, I found myself involved in hours-long conversations with editors that bordered on surreal. A few months later, the Mercury News officially backed away from Dark Alliance, publishing a long column by Jerry Ceppos apologizing for “shortcomings” in the series. The New York Times hailed Ceppos for setting a brave new standard for dealing with “egregious errors” and splashed his apology on their front page, the first time the series had ever been mentioned there. I quit the Mercury News after that. (p. 153)

The CIA’s knowledge and involvement had been far greater than I’d ever imagined. Agents and officials of the DEA had protected the traffickers from arrest, something I’d not been allowed to print. At the start of the Contra war, the CIA and Justice Department had worked out an unusual agreement that permitted the CIA not to have to report allegations of drug trafficking by its agents to the Justice Department. It was a curious loophole in the law, to say the least. (p. 154)

The Mercury News had broken the rules and used the Internet to get in by the back door, leaving the big papers momentarily embarrassed. It forced them to readdress an issue they’d much rather have forgotten. By turning on the Mercury News, the big boys were reminding the rest of the flock who really runs the newspaper business, Internet or no Internet, and the extent to which they will go to protect that power, even if it meant rearranging reality to suit them. (p. 155)

Do we have a free press today? Sure we do. It’s free to report all the sex scandals it wants, all the stock market news we can handle, every new health fad that comes down the pike, and every celebrity marriage or divorce that happens. But when it comes to the real down and dirty stuff – stories like Tailwind, the October Surprise, the El Mozote massacre, corporate corruption, or CIA involvement in drug trafficking – that’s where we begin to see the limits of our freedoms. In today’s mass media environment, sadly, such stories are not even open for discussion. Back in 1938, when fascism was sweeping Europe, legendary investigative reporter George Seldes observed that “it is possible to fool all the people all the time – when government and press cooperate.” Unfortunately, we have reached that point. (p. 156)

See Mr. Webb’s riveting book Dark Alliance on He was found dead in December 2004. It was strangely declared a suicide even though public reports stated that he had not one, but two bullets in his head.

John Kelly is first author with Phillip Wearne of Tainting Evidence: Inside the Scandals at the FBI Crime Lab, which was nominated for a Pulitzer Prize. It is the first, and to date, the only, contemporaneous critical account of the FBI to be published by a mainstream publisher. He is also an independent investigative producer. He is the former editor and senior writer for the National Reporter, a publication specializing in reporting on the CIA.

According to the Central Intelligence Agency itself, as reported by the House Intelligence Committee, “The Clandestine Service of the CIA is the only part of the Intelligence Community, indeed of government, where hundreds of employees on a daily basis are directed to break extremely serious laws in countries around the world. A safe estimate is that several hundred times every day (easily 100,000 times a year), officers engage in highly illegal activities.” (pp. 115, 116)

The national security of the United States requires that more than 100,000 extremely serious crimes be committed every year. The [House Intelligence] Committee expressed no legal or ethical concerns about these crimes. The committee indicated that it did not matter that laws were broken because they were laws of other countries. The CIA [is] committing crimes against humanity with de facto impunity and Congressional sanctioning. (pp. 116, 117)

Government documents, including CIA reports, show that the CIA’s crimes include terrorism, assassination, torture, and systematic violations of human rights. The documents show that these crimes are part and parcel of deliberate CIA policy. The report notes that CIA personnel are “directed” to commit crimes. (p. 117)

CIA documents show that the CIA created, trained, and armed death squads in Guatemala as part of its coup and destabilization of the democratically elected government in 1954. In Honduras, the CIA’s own inspector general reported that paid CIA assets at the highest level created and ran a death squad which, according to the Honduran government, murdered at least 184 people. The House Intelligence Committee’s only concern regarding these brutal CIA informants and other CIA offenders was that they might be arrested and prosecuted. The committee did not advise the CIA to cease or limit its lawlessness. The Senate Intelligence Committee proposed a bill that would immunize CIA offenders who violate treaties and international agreements while following orders. The bill passed both houses of Congress and was signed into law by President Bill Clinton on December 27, 2000. (pp. 117-118)

[This law] means that the Constitution does not apply to the CIA or any US intelligence personnel. Why? Because the constitution provides that all treaties are the supreme law of the land. Not just law, but the supreme law – no exceptions. There was not a peep from the mass media about any of this even though such a story would not have affected corporate sponsorship or profits. (pp. 119)

The intelligence committees recommended that the “aggressive recruitment” of “terrorist informants who have human rights violations in their background” be “one of the highest priorities.” Within months of instituting the guidelines, incoming CIA director George Tenet assured Congress that not a single unsavory applicant had been rejected. (pp. 120, 121)

Former ambassador Robert White wrote that Manuel Noriega of Panama, Colonel Julio Alpirez of Guatemala, General Gustavo Alvarez Martinez of Honduras, Colonel Nicolas Carranza of El Salvador, and Emmanuel Constant of Haiti, all major human rights abusers, were CIA informants who “enjoyed profitable contractual arrangements with the CIA not because they were particularly important sources of information, but because they served as paid agents of influence who promoted actions or policies favored by the CIA in that country.” (p. 122)

Former CIA General Counsel Sporkin revealed that the CIA, not the president, creates findings to fit preordained covert operations and sends the findings to the president for his signature. (p. 126, 127)

There is next to no meaningful coverage ever of the CIA in the mainstream media, let alone analysis. The few exceptions prove the rule. In 1984, I was involved in one such exception. ABC hired me to help produce a story about an investment firm in Hawaii that was heavily involved with the CIA. I had earlier provided the same story to BBC’s Newsnight, which aired it. The story was fully documented, and nobody, including the CIA, was able to disprove the charges. Part of the report charged that the CIA had plotted to assassinate an American, Ron Rewald, the president of [the investment firm]. The ABC report provoked a brutal response from the CIA. The CIA demanded a full retraction without providing any counterproof other than their denial. (pp. 130, 131)

At the center of the uproar was Scott Barnes who said on camera that the CIA had asked him to kill Rewald. After the show aired, CIA officials met with ABC News executive David Burke. They presented no evidence to counter the charges made in the program. Nonetheless, Burke was sufficiently impressed “by the vigor with which they made their case” to order an on-air “clarification” in which Peter Jennings acknowledged the CIA’s position but stood by the story. But that was not good enough. [CIA Director William] Casey called ABC Chairman Leonard H. Goldenson. The call led to three meetings between ABC officials and Stanley Sporkin, CIA general counsel. On November 21, 1984, despite all the documented evidence presented in the program, Peter Jennings reported that ABC could no longer substantiate the charges, and that “We have no reason to doubt the CIA’s denial.” He presented no evidence supporting the CIA’s position. (pp. 131, 132)

That same day, the CIA filed a formal complaint with the FCC, written by Sporkin and signed by [CIA Director] Casey, charging that ABC had “deliberately distorted” the news. Casey asked that ABC be stripped of its TV and radio licenses. This was the first time in the history of the country that a government agency had formally attacked the press. Yet, there was no uproar. (p. 132)

During this time, Capital Cities Communications was maneuvering to buy ABC. [CIA Director] Casey was one of the founders of Cap Cities. Cap Cities bought ABC for $3.5 billion, which was called a “bargain rate” by the trade media. Besides Casey, two other founders of Cap Cities had extensive ties to the intelligence community. Within months, the entire investigative unit [of ABC] was dispersed, and the commentator on the Rewald program was assigned to covering beauty pageants. Needless to say, my contract was not renewed. (pp. 132, 122)

For Mr. Kelly’s book Tainting Evidence: Inside the Scandals at the FBI Crime Lab,see

Carl Jensen, Ph.D., founder and director emeritus of Project Censored, America’s longest running research project on mass media censorship, has been involved with the media for more than 50 years as a daily newspaper reporter, weekly newspaper publisher, public relations practitioner, advertising executive, educator, and author. Jensen is author of the 1990-1996 annual Project Censored yearbooks, Censored: The News That Didn’t Make the News … and Why. He has won numerous awards for his work.

There were 50 major media corporations in 1993, and now there are only about half a dozen. Corporate socialization has been exacerbated by the multibillion-dollar mergers that created international giants such as AOL Time Warner, Disney, General Electric, News Corporation, and Viacom. (pp. 425-428)

Shortly after the outbreak of the First Terrorist War of the 21st Century, I was reminded of what US Senator Hiram Johnson said during World War I: “The first casualty when war comes, is truth.” Post-September 11, 2001, the free flow of information in America is slowing to a carefully monitored trickle. The president of the US says he can only trust eight members of Congress. The attorney general admonishes Congress to pass the controversial Anti-Terrorism Act without debate. The national security adviser cautions TV networks not to broadcast press conferences with Taliban leaders because they may contain hidden messages. The military tells the press this is a “different war” and thus it can’t observe the 1992 agreement allowing the media more access to information. The president’s press secretary warns the media and all Americans to watch what they say and watch what they do. These are ominous signs for democracy. (pp. 432, 433)

In the same way that we survived Pearl Harbor, we will survive the Sept. 11 terrorist attack. In the meantime, let us not be terrorized into giving up any of our constitutionally guaranteed rights. (p. 434)

Click here for the excellent mass media censorship website Prof. Jensen founded.

Robert McChesney has written or edited seven books and is currently research professor at the Institute of Communications Research at the University of Illinois. He has made more than 500 radio and TV appearances and has been the subject of nearly 50 published interviews.

Professional journalism had three distinct biases built into it, biases that remain to this day. First, it regarded anything done by official sources, for example, government officials and prominent public figures, as the basis for legitimate news. Second, professional journalism posited that there had to be a news hook or a news peg to justify a news story. [This] helped to stimulate the birth and rapid rise of the public relations (PR) industry. Surveys show that PR accounts for anywhere from 40 to 70 percent of what appears as news. The third bias is that [professional journalism] smuggles in values conducive to the commercial aims of the owners and advertisers as well as the political aims of the owning class. The affairs of government are subjected to much closer scrutiny than the affairs of big business. The genius of professionalism in journalism is that it tends to make journalists oblivious to the compromises with authority they routinely make. (pp. 440, 441)

Professional journalism equates the spread of “free markets” with the spread of democracy. To the US elite, however, democracy tends to be defined by their ability to maximize profit in a nation, and that is, in effect, the standard of professional journalism. (p. 442)

[There] is the striking consolidation of the mass media from hundreds of significant firms to an integrated industry dominated by less than ten enormous transnational conglomerates and rounded out by no more than another fifteen very large firms. The first tier giants include AOL Time Warner, Disney, Viacom, News Corporation, Bertelsmann, Vivendi Universal, Sony, AT&T, and General Electric. The nine or ten largest media conglomerates now almost all rank among the 300 largest firms in the world; in 1965, there were barely any media firms among the five hundred largest companies in the world. (p. 444)

The largest ten media firms own all the US TV networks, most of the TV stations in the largest markets, all major film studios, all major music companies, nearly all of the cable TV channels, much of the book and magazine publishing [industry], and much, much more. The logic of mass media industries is that a firm can no longer compete if it is not part of a larger conglomerate. General Electric’s NBC is the only commercial TV network that does not own a major Hollywood film studio. (pp. 444, 445)

Expensive investigative journalism – especially that which goes after powerful corporate or national security interests – is discouraged. Largely irrelevant human interest/tragedy stories get the green light for extensive coverage. These are cheap, easy to cover, and they never antagonize those in power. The mass media companies claim they are responding to demand. (p. 445)

Throughout the 1980s and 1990s, real income declined or was stagnant for the lower 60 percent, while wealth and income for the rich skyrocketed. By 1998, discounting home ownership, the top 10 percent of the population claimed 76 percent of the nation’s net worth. More than half is accounted for by the richest 1 percent. The Washington Post has gone so far as to describe ours as a nearly “perfect economy,” which [reveals] the vantage point of the corporate news media. And it does appear more and more perfect the higher one goes up the socioeconomic ladder. (pp. 447, 448)

The rate of incarceration has more than doubled since the late 1980s. The US now has five times more prisoners per capita than Canada and seven times more than the whole of Western Europe. The US has 5 percent of the world’s population and 25 percent of the world’s prisoners. Nearly 90 percent of prisoners are jailed for nonviolent offenses, often casualties of the so-called drug war. It is a debate among Democrats and Republicans over who can be “tougher” on crime, hire more police, and build more prisons. Almost overnight, the prison-industrial complex has become a big business and a powerful lobby for public funds. (p. 448)

In the year 2000, a Texas man received 16 years in prison for stealing a Snickers candy bar, while four executives at Hoffman-LaRoche were found guilty of conspiring to suppress and eliminate competition in the vitamin industry in what the Justice Department called perhaps the largest criminal antitrust conspiracy in history. The four executives were fined anywhere from $75,000 to $350,000. They received prison terms ranging from three all the way up to four months. (p. 449)

The propagandistic nature of the war coverage was made crystal clear by AOL Time Warner’s CNN a few weeks after the war began in Afghanistan. CNN president Walter Isaacson authorized CNN to provide two different versions of the war: a more critical one for the global audience and a sugarcoated one for Americans. Isaacson instructed the domestic CNN to be certain that any story that might undermine support for the US war be balanced with a reminder that the war on terrorism is a response to the heinous attacks of September 11. (p. 452)

We need to press for the overhaul of the media system, so that it serves democratic values rather than the interests of capital. The US media system has nothing to do with the wishes of the Founding Fathers and even less to do with the workings of some alleged free market. To the contrary, the media system is the result of laws, government subsidies, and regulations made in the public’s name, but made corruptly behind closed doors without the public’s informed consent. The largest media firms are all built on top of the profits generated by government gifts of monopoly rights. It is impossible to conceive of a better world with a media system that remains under the thumb of Wall Street and Madison Avenue, under the thumb of the owning class. It is nearly impossible to conceive of a better world without some changes in the media status quo. We have no time to waste. (p. 453)

For several books Prof. McChesney has written or edited, see


Galactic Federation: Declaration of Sovereignty forPlanet Earth

Ashtar Sheran: Psychological Warfare

Ashtar Sheran: Psychological Warfare

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

by Sharon Stewart


Me: Ashtar, can you please take me to your ship? I need a moment’s sanity!

Ashtar: Reading the news again, Sharon?

Me: LOL Trudeau is saying we can’t let China intimidate us into releasing the two people Canada took into custody, while a few weeks ago he sold off all our gold to China.

Ashtar: It depends on which China he’s dealing with – the communists or the white hats.

Me: Who’s asking for the release of these people then?

Ashtar: The White Hats.

Me: That explains it. Who’s in charge of that country anyway?

Ashtar: There’s a mix. Often the leader at the top of any country has two sides he has to answer to. Same as Trump. The dark hats are trying to blackmail him, now a book out written by his relative, and then the white hats (alliance) instructing him on how to go further. Then there is his own sense of what he has to do as well. So it gets complicated, shall we say.

For many world leaders, it’s a question of who threatens the least and holds out the most money. Each political faction holds sway with the other. Sometimes they compromise for the sake of gaining ground elsewhere, and sometimes they just pay the other faction their price in order to further their agenda. Obviously, the white hats can be more stubborn but other times they’ll take a compromise to further their gains in the future. Sometimes, what looks like a good move for the Deep State is in fact their future undoing. You know that policies were created by the Obama and Bush governments that are now leading to their arrests. (1)

Me: Yes. What’s going on in Turkey now? They’re trying to take over the Middle East? LOL When are the people of the Middle East going to join together and say they’ve had enough? They need to make themselves one solidified state and tell the rest of the world to bug out, but of course they’re all fighting with each other.

Ashtar: Which is by design. Their leaders know what’s at stake. The Middle East is a prized area because of otherworldly resources. It’s not that much about oil as you’ve been led to believe although that can be part of it. It’s who’s living in the Middle East and how they’re trying to connect with the galaxy that there is warring over.

Me: So there isn’t really any unified government running a country, is there?

Ashtar: No, not really and this is advantageous now because then you’ll see more clearly who the bad guys are and who the good guys are. In the States it’s divided into 52 pieces.

Washington, New York and Los Angeles are still in dark hat hands. These states are the major leaders in the U.S. economy, and they have been doing negotiating of their own as well as banding together to fight Trump.

We all know California has been trying to split from the rest of the States and has been doing some negotiating at a world level already. The more resources each state holds, the more it can provide to world markets, the more likely it is that they can split off and form their own territory or even country. For California, this is why the focus on exposing the pedophile rings, because this way the rest of the world will be mortified and California will lose its global appeal.

Me: Ah. What about New York?
Ashtar: Antifa has been active in New York and is making the state and the capital look unappealing to tourists, that is to say, those who are even considering traveling now at this time of uncertainty. It would stand to reason that many tourists would skip a large city like NYC for the very fact that the potential of receiving the virus would be greater there. And New York has been one of the worst hit spots in the country.

Me: So why try to kill off your own state’s economy, how does that…. oh yeah, of course. New World Order economy. They’re trying to bring in the one world economy by bringing down the individual economies of each state and then each country.

Ashtar: Yes. Larger areas of the states, and that is to say larger economic regions, are hardest hit. These states primarily are Deep State run, so the more states swing to Republican run states, the healthier they will become.

Unfortunately, there is still the rioting. When the world’s people realize that everyone matters, not just separate groups, but every person, then the Cabal will have met its match.

This is not to make light of the situation of African Americans, it’s been of terrible oppression, but when you all learn to treat each other with humanitarian values, instead of the values you have been taught by the Deep State, Secret Military and the Dark Ones, you’ll be far better off.

Suffice it to say, there is more coming down the pipes. Those states who do swing to Republican will experience further attack by the Deep State. This could look like any number of ways. False flags, radiation spills, further lockdowns, even viruses released into the drinking water.

Me: Great.

Ashtar: The deep state runs and has always run, by intimidation. They use a mafia-style approach to controlling their subjects. Most have been oblivious to this because it hasn’t come down to the deep state losing its power over the people, but this is what is going on now. They’re losing. And they don’t like it.

Watch the news carefully to understand which states are in the headlines. These are the possible target states before the election. If a state swings over, then trouble may well start there.

This is psychological warfare.

Me: Yeah, there was a state that got a new governor, I think, who is a Republican and Q follower, instead of the Democrat who was in there previously. That might be one they would target as retribution for their loss.

Ashtar: For example.

You also noticed that after a few days of extreme heat that the “Global Warming” headlines started again. People have to realize how manipulated they are. First of all, the Deep State controls the weather and they can make it as hot or as cold as they like; and then they produce the headlines to get people panicking. That’s the last thing you need to do. Don’t panic.

The other thing that everyone has to realize is what they think is only part of the truth. Even for those who we have informed, the keyboard warriors, the Anons, only know part of the truth. There is more going on in the background and it tends to be revealed when either the deep state forces our hand, or we need to release the information to you so that you will hold that idea in your minds. Then you’ll help us create that timeline. That’s how it works.

Me: There are still some pretty resistant people, I’ve noticed. They think Trump is lying, trying to fool the public. That it’s all a big play on the part of the Cabal and Trump is in on it. They point out he’s a cabalist too.

Ashtar: Don’t underestimate the work of trolls. They’re all over the internet. There are also people who have this mindset, and they still have to be convinced.

Me: So what’s it going to take? How close to the edge do we have to get before these people see the Light?

Ashtar: You’re pretty close now but you’ll get even closer.

Me: Great. I can hear that song, “The eve of destruction,” playing in my head.

Ashtar: Your people are destructive. And they believe that destroying is the solution to everything. If something’s wrong, destroy it with guns. Blow it up. Fight fire with fire. At some point, you’ll see new laws put into place and enacted on by honest citizens in positions of power and your faith in the system will begin to be restored.

The problem is the people all have to be on board, and they’re not. So those who are of high light are still holding the Light for the ones who are chaotic, creating riots and fighting.

Me: When are we going to see announcements?

Ashtar: Within a year. Everything depends on your progress. For now, watch what Trump says. He’s as close to the truth as you’re going to get right now. He and Q.

Me: I think people would feel better if something would happen that would restore their faith in the system but nothing’s happened yet.

Ashtar: Some are getting wage subsidies. You got some.

Me: I did.

Ashtar: These are the beginnings of the St Germain payouts, the RV. Right now will be uncomfortable, but when the market crashes and money is worthless, then the RV will be paid out. When the market crashes, we’ll have arraigned all the dark ones, the deep state, and they won’t be able to control economics anymore.

Me: When do you see that?

Ashtar: My best guess is this year. Some say the economy has already crashed, but it hasn’t. When everything hits zero, that’s what I’m talking about. When it’s impossible to trade shares anymore because you can’t afford to buy them, their prices are so inflated. And when the price of gas dictates you can’t drive anymore. When so many businesses have gone out of business.

Me: I’d say that’s still a way off.

Ashtar: Possibly. But just wait. When Trump gains power again for his second term, then watch the fireworks. At this point, the Deep State will have nothing to lose. They’ll pull out all the stops and try to blame Trump. This entire operation hinges on people waking up, and they are.

Me: I know people who are sewing covid masks and selling them.

Ashtar: Opportunists. The hinge pin of economics.

When people don’t believe their governments anymore, we’ve won.

Me: So why should they believe Trump? He’s still a big rich fat cat.

Ashtar: He is. But he wants to revise the American economy that the Globalists have tried to destroy in the last few years. And it has affected his wealth, so he has a personal investment in making America great again. He’s reversing what they’ve done and will set it back on its feet again. That will install the people’s faith in him. He’s already made progress despite what’s been going on. He fears that his family will lose all the money he has built up over the years as well as the legacy of his forebears, and that his children and grandchildren will live in squalor under a globalist regime, because unless he does this, that is what will happen in America. He understands that short term pain will mean long term freedom for his country.

Me: So that’s another reason they want everyone at home: so they are unemployed.

Ashtar: Yes, they know what Trump is trying to create, and they’re countering so that he can’t create it. Employment is an obvious part of the platform of each candidate and job creation is important to Americans. There are other areas like healthcare, so of course, bring in a virus and destroy healthcare. Government spending, relations with other countries Trump has done well in, especially North Korea. He’s withdrawn financial support from the WHO, and walked away from the United Nations. This sends a big message out. He is taking on the globalists and beginning by withdrawing America’s financial support.

Me: I think they have to be careful because he’s already talking about the Deep State.

Ashtar: Yes, and this is for a reason: to let people know he’s not behind the problems in the economy right now. The fact that he’s said this much is alarming to the Deep State because once they’re completely outed, the people will realize they’ve been taken advantage of.

Me: I think that’s happening. Ricky Gervais’ speech at the academy awards was also another one.

Ashtar: And the news circulated by the Anons to reveal the truth to other people.

Me: I’ve done my part! LOL

Ashtar: Any way you can get the word out and get people to think.

Me: There’s still resistance. People don’t want to be let out of their jail cells. They’re comfortable there. Personally, I still think it’s going to get worse, much worse.

Ashtar: Yes, it might have to, and that’s their decision. However many can be saved.

The last thing I want to point out to you is the exoneration of people like General Flynn, and the failed impeachment of Donald Trump are showing the public who the bad guys are, and who they can trust.

Me: Is that just people who believe Trump, though?

Ashtar: It gives you more people to believe in. Because so many people still trust the system, when they see General Flynn exonerated, then they believe him to be a good man.

Me: Let’s see.

Ashtar: And you are waiting for him to prove himself.

Me: I’m waiting to see if Trump takes Flynn on board and gives him a position of authority. When he does, then I can believe he’s a white hat. I’m still wondering why Dr Jekyll is still up there, but of course the truthers are doing a lot to discredit him.

Ashtar: Which counts as well. He’ll go down.

Me: And he’ll be holding Bill Gates’ hand.

Ashtar: This is a game of proving to the American public, and the world, who’s worth believing in and who isn’t. There are many already who have fallen from the graces of the general public, many actors and other people of influence. You see the decks are being stacked as we speak.

Me: I’m hoping the white hats will just one day all stand up and “come out” to the public.

Thank you Ashtar.

Ashtar: Adonai.


(1) Steve: It isn’t clear whether Ashtar is saying Pres. Obama himself will be arrested, but, if he was, the Golden Age of Gaia would decline to agree.


What’s Going on Here?

What’s Going On Here? – Part 1/2

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

I found this sight moving knowing where the Alliance was back in 2007. And now….

The basic question in sociology is: What’s the definition of the situation here?

That same question faces this generation, although more like: What in the world is going on here?

We’re all of us looking for an answer.

Many of you’ll have heard this answer before. You’re welcome to skip to the next article.

I want to allow the historical and sociological side of me to emerge a bit. Just feel the need to.  I’ve got cabin fever.

What’s going on here is a change of planetary management.

Present planetary controllers reach into most government agencies, financial institutions, religious, educational, medical and many other areas of life.

The most generic name for them is the Illuminati. They’re also called the New World Order, the cabal, the deep state (although that is slightly different, apparently), etc.

I say the name just for ease of reference, not to start a new meme like “Khazarian” or “leftist.” They themselves call themselves the Illuminati and the New World Order.

They’re deeply entrenched in every sense of the word and in so many areas of life that they never thought anyone could threaten them.

Their control of the mainstream media seemed to mean that we’d never hear anything about their true dealings.

Just remember “Pizzagate” and how the media ridiculed pedophilia and buried the subject. And look now, as the truth breaks forth.

The Alliance has been steadily growing since I started in 2007 to watch various units walk off with the nuclear football, refuse to fight in Iran, foil an attempt to convey nuclear weapons to the Middle East, etc.

Those were isolated incidents, but, ever since 2007, the liberators have been growing in strength and taking back one government agency and military organization after another.

When you look at the officers arrayed behind Pres. Trump a few years back, I just feel moved seeing where it came from, so to speak. And now here we are. The white hats are arresting the Illuminati and freeing their victims. Again this is only the visible half of the team.

I believe the “Alliance” – the liberators – continue to use the pandemic and our lockdown as a cover for their operations.

Standing behind them are galactic beings from the Galactic Federation of Light and the Unified Forces of the Outer Galaxy.  Standing behind them are beings we’ve only ever heard of in myth and religious stories – the Divine Mother, Archangel Gabrielle, and Archangel Michael.

Knowing who’s behind us leads me to say that those who are with us are far stronger than those who are arrayed against us.

More of the story can be read in the free downloadable books on this site.


If I were to discuss everything this cabal has been up to, you’d lose your lunch. I guarantee it.

What I’ve seen in researching the subject passes the outer limits of disgust and horribleness. I thank God I didn’t have to grow up in an Illuminati family.

They haven’t been willing to relinquish their control and go off quietly into the night. They were causing wars, bankrupting the world, spreading pandemics, chemtrails, “natural” disasters, etc.

The Illuminati’s plan has often changed. At one point it was World War III. At another, terrorists and rogue states. At another, a pandemic.  Their modus operandi is divide and conquer. Anyone who opposes them they swarm.

They murdered George Floyd, smashed windows, looted stores, even fired on peaceful residents in a quiet neighborhood of Minneapolis – all the Illuminati. Poor souls.

Even though I think Pres. Trump and his team knew full well that groups like Antifa were mobilizing (what have we an NSA for?), I actually believe he stood back so his team could be seen as reacting rather than initiating.

If he’d acted ahead of the curve  the American people might think he was censoring and bullying, instead of arresting a gang of thugs and crisis actors.

They also wouldn’t have seen such revealing videos of staged protests, men purposely and leisurely breaking store windows, “police” firing on citizens they’re sworn to serve and protect.  Doesn’t it make more sense to let America see it, as tragic as it is?

After I wrote this I came across the following passage from Ivo of Vega through Sharon Stewart:

“[The cabal] are on a short time frame and will be rushing through many of their new world order implementations now. Trump allows them because the people need to see who is really out to harm them and who isn’t.” (1)

I agree.

Watch for a replay when the President gives his lengthy briefings after this is all over, showing they filmed … what they needed to film.

(Concluded in Part 2, below.)


(1) “Surveillance Technology | Ivo of Vega via Sharon Stewart,” Voyages of Light,


What’s Going On Here? – Part 2/2

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

Ask about Illuminati

(Concluded from Part 1, above.)

We’re hearing about this invisible but no-less-titanic struggle going on backstage.

But all of it goes on in a context.

It’s happening within the context of the start of a golden age for Earth.  This is another part of the story.

The vibrations, frequency, pace of life are rising. Consciousness is increasing. Love and compassion are blossoming.

The more refined environment won’t prove suitable to the Illuminati. They’ll come around if they can or they’ll leave, by any convenient means – Covid-19, opioids, a heart attack.

The finer vibrations for them would be like the top of a mountain for us. Harder to breath, and so on. (1)

Their financial empire is under attack on several fronts – the IRS and Federal Reserve have been absorbed into the Treasury Dept., the world is back on the gold standard, an executive order mandates the sequestering of the wealth of serious human-rights abusers, a Reval is coming, etc.


That’s what’s happening between the controllers and the liberators.

And then there’s us: the humanitarian lightworkers who participated in the Reval. (2)

Once the cabal has been subdued, whenever that may be, I expect the floodgates of abundance to be opened.  That prediction and the one on your last fortune cookie have about the same weight.

Stories have been appearing that indicate that Pres. Trump wants the Reval now – or at a near date – in order to prevent the nation from disintegrating under widespread poverty and lack of work.

Judy Byington’s report today said that Trump was looking to lightworkers to do their humanitarian duty after the Reval.  I have no idea if the report is true but I like this version of events:

“Trump was making sure that currency and ZIM holders with job creation and humanitarian projects to help create jobs and end homelessness and joblessness post-Covid-19 shutdown, would be treated with the most flexibility in higher rate requests and negotiations.

“POTUS wanted ZIM holders post-redemption to help invest in job-creating, local economy stimulating, projects in their communities and states (e.g., in one or more of HUD’s 8,761 Opportunity Zones, areas of depressed local economies in each state and near your city, town, county needing private investment funds to create jobs).

“POTUS wanted ZIM holders to do our part to invest in job creating projects that would help bring the economy back to life nationally.” (3)

Maybe he’d take on the job of keeping track of who needs what. Lightworkers can simply contribute if they wish to, like Patreon or Go Fund Me.

I welcome his interest and would be happy to work with him.

Think if humanitarian lightworkers in all countries joined together to see that there was a suitable, culturally-specific universal basic income in every country? We could do it.

Universal medicare everywhere?  We could do it.

You get my message. If Pres. Trump really is willing to allow humanitarian lightworkers a meaningful role in financing humanitarian programs of universal value, then we have a game to play. I haven’t felt I’ve had a game to play since the day the music died – Nov. 22, 1963.


My goal for myself is the redistribution of wealth globally through financing universal basic incomes, universal medicare, universal accessibility to education, etc.

Those are the mechanisms whereby I’ll take the proceeds of my currency exchange, plus revenues as a pipeline, and reintroduce them into the economy. We’ll build a level playing field. We can do it.

So that’s “what’s going on here,” in a nutshell: A battle between controllers and liberators, plus invisible allies, taking place within a context of rising vibrations, during the upswing of a golden age, with the controllers fated to crumble.

And a new chapter of abundance and compassion about to open up, starring none other than you and me.

Are you ready?


(1) Their situation will become like residents of the afterlife who go too high in vibration for their constitution to stand the environment:

“Should a man try to live in that rarified spiritual air [of a higher plane than Lawrence occupies] who carried still in his being the uncleansed stains of earth, his sufferings would be terrible, as intense as the joy of which he would be capable of when he is cleansed of them.” (T.E. Lawrence [Lawrence of Arabia] through Jane Sherwood, medium, Post-Mortem Journal. Communications from T.E. Lawrence. London: Spearman, 1964, 86.)

“As I proceed I shall see all the unmistakable signs – and feel them – of a realm of greater spiritual refinement. There will eventually come a point in my walking when I can go no further because I shall feel most uncomfortable spiritually.

“If I should be foolish enough to try to defy these feelings, I should, at length, find that I was completely unable to venture a foot forward without undergoing sensations which I could not possibly bear.” (Monsignor Robert Hugh Benson through Anthony Borgia, medium, Life in the World Unseen. M.A.P., 1993, 132-3.)

(2) See Financial Wayshowing and Stewardship at

(3) “Restored Republic via a GCR: Special Report of June 1, 2020,” Intel Dinar Chronicles, June 1, 2020, at


Eclipse experiences 4

Mary Magdelene on The Eclipse and Mother’s Love
Heavenly Blessings ~ Mary Magdelene on The Eclipse and Mother’s Love
August 24, 2017 By Paul Backes

August 24, 2017 ~ Suzanne Maresca and Linda Dillon welcome Mary Magdelene to the show to discuss the further anchoring of the Divine Feminine.

Our guest made clear that this is about all of us, no matter our gender or sexual orientation.

The Solar Eclipse earlier this week was an electro-magnetic surge in tandem with the Mother’s Tsunami of Love.

Airs every second Thursday at 4pm PT/7pm ET
There is no call-in number

We’re allowing the Divine Feminine to sweep through us, correcting the imbalance in our hearts and beings.

Tune in for a discussion on the birthing of a new reality onto our planet.

Heavenly Blessings is a show in which we join with the Council of Love to share gifts, blessings, stories and insights through meditation, channeling and conversation. This show aims to assist individuals on their individual journey and also to build support and mutuality with the inhabitants of earth, the higher realms, and with our star brothers and sisters. Produced by Paul Backes.

Music: Sasha Lazard, Angeli and Snatam Kaur, Long Time Sun

Linda’s website ~

For those who wish to support our efforts with a donation ~

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

The Story Behind the Massive Panama Papers Leak – Golden Age of Gaia

Jabeen Bhatti, USA Today, April 4, 2016 BERLIN — It started with an email in early 2015: “Hello, this is John Doe. Interested in data?” “We are very interested,” replied a journalist in Munich. The exchange resulted in internal documents from Mossack Fonseca — a Panama law firm that creates anonymous offshore companies around …

Source: The Story Behind the Massive Panama Papers Leak – Golden Age of Gaia

What’s the Future of the Mainstream Mass Media? – Part 2/2 – Golden Age of Gaia

(Concluded from Part 1.) Wes Annac’s sources predict a tsunami of truth will suddenly come from the MSM. “However difficult it might be to envision right now, there will be a time when your mainstream media seems to suddenly start reporting the truth about waves and waves of important subjects that humanity has been lied …

Source: What’s the Future of the Mainstream Mass Media? – Part 2/2 – Golden Age of Gaia