Dr Sherri Tenpenny Explains How the Depopulation COVID Vaccines will Start Working in 3-6 Months
Hit graphic to go to Brandnewtube and watch video
The Covid Vaccine On Trial: If You Only Knew…
Robert Kennedy is joined by world renowned experts (physicians, scientists, lawyers, activists etc.) who discuss the many unanswered questions regarding the safety and effectiveness of the COVID vaccine on February 10, 2021.
Click on graphic to go to video
Topics
Are they safe and effective?
Can you be forced to take one?
Who’s liable if anything goes wrong?
How do I protect my right to choose?
Discover what the mainstream media is not telling you!
The end of your pandemic is not yet in sight but it will come as increased effort is being put in to reduce its effects. The net result is that time is being bought to allow for more important events to happen that will alter the outcome.
It must ensure that it firmly places your feet upon the path that will leave the old behind, and already plans are afoot to permanently change your way of life, cutting out what would otherwise have taken many years to achieve.
Whilst reaching a new level of understanding is essential, you must also respond to the opportunity to take a quantum leap forward and make up for lost time that has set you back so many years. We are in fact prompting and guiding those equipped to carry you forward to new heights. Of course the whole world needs to settle down and it cannot happen overnight.
Be assured that the many souls that have incarnated for this particular time are eager to get going, so as to introduce new technologies that will increase your quality of life. Many changes that would lift you up have already been drawn up and just await the right moment to be introduced. The quality of your lives will change for the better and there will be a general aim to make the changes available to everyone.
For too long people have lived in groups that have had to fend for themselves resulting in an enormous gap between the “haves” and “have not’s.” That is unacceptable in this modern age. The problem has resulted in a relatively small number of people holding the larger percentage of the world’s wealth.
Unfortunately such people are only beholden to self and are quite happy to make others subservient to them. This situation must change until there is more equality throughout the world. We at our level are doing all we can to shape people’s minds so that they understand the nature of changes that are necessary to bring more fairness and sharing into your lives.
The very nature of your earlier approach to life has been one of “everyone for themselves” that has resulted in an unfair system where the rich get richer and the poor get poorer. (1) There really are sufficient riches upon the Earth to ensure everyone can live without suffering poverty and hardships. With the right people at the helm there is nothing that cannot be achieved.
For some time now the people of Earth have been waking up to the inequalities of life, and current unrest and big demonstrations will continue growing until those in power concede to their demands for changes, that will herald a new and fairer way of life where everyone enjoys the fruits of life. The power mongers will have to step aside forcibly if necessary but without using violence.
The Law itself can be a powerful tool when used correctly and can maintain Law and Order, but of late it has been used aggressively and unlawfully to suppress peaceful demonstrations. In a true Democracy such things would not be allowed so it is time to appoint those people into power who would observe the Law and promote peace.
Dear Ones, you are incredibly resilient and determined to change things and you have our support even if it is not always apparent to you, as we work mainly from the higher levels but never impose ourselves upon you. We respect your freedom of choice and freewill, however as we have often mentioned, there is a greater plan for your advancement and we will do our best to ensure that it is fulfilled. It will be guided into place through those who have incarnated specifically for this period of time. It may be difficult for you to grasp the true happenings as you might say “behind the scenes” but be assured that all is progressing as planned in spite of the outer image.
We reiterate what we have told you previously, that there is a plan for Humanity that will give everyone the opportunity to ascend if they accept it. Once again, keep positive and visualise all that is pure and wholesome and remember to be careful and not give your energy to the dark Ones b:y focussing on their actions. It may be hard to do but send out your love to them so that it softens their actions and lifts them up. It is a tall order but it is the way to continue raising the vibrations of the planet.
Mother Earth plays her part but follows a path that is primarily for the benefit of the Earth itself. So far Man has decimated much of the Earth and affected its cycles so much that nature herself has been turned upside down, and without being too dramatic is slowly dying along with many of the animal species.
It is never too late to change your ways but it will take a long time to restore the Earth to her former glory, but it will happen as we have previously mentioned. Those dear souls who care for the Earth are still trying their best to cope but the odds are against them without some help from us.
You reap what you sow and cannot expect others to clear up the mess you are making. We may have technologies that would make short work of restoring the Earth but you reap what you sow. However, do not be disheartened as it is important that you keep your vibrations high and so help others who are struggling to deal with the problems in their lives.
With so many deaths resulting from CoronaVirus it is understandably very difficult for those involved to overcome the experience, but know that there is no such thing as death inasmuch that the soul is immortal and lives on much the same as on Earth, but in a higher vibration that is very acceptable. You are still in your body but a more perfect version than the one you had on Earth, and you will again meet family and friends who are already there.
There is of course more to it than what has been mentioned, but at least it should give you some comfort that you will again meet your loved ones and friends on the other side. As you might expect, they follow your progress and if you are one who goes out of the body during your sleep period you are more than likely to visit those who have passed on already. However, few souls remember such meetings and that is intentional inasmuch that you need to concentrate on your daily experiences on Earth without being distracted.
In the long run everything will work out satisfactorily and it will be due reward for your ups and downs as a soul upon Earth. It is a very special time to be on it and although very taxing it is also very rewarding when you succeed in living to your pre-arranged life plan. Many souls would have loved to change places with you to experience the events on Earth at this special time but not everyone could be accommodated.
I leave you with love and blessings, and may the Light brighten your days and path to completion. This message comes through my Higher Self my God Self, and every soul has the same connection to God.
The original article posted in the Daily Mail on October 30, 2020 was written by Dr. Yeadon himself. For those who may be pressed for time and just want to cut to the chase, we’ve chosen a few key sentences and phrases that cover the core issues laid out in the full article.
Three facts No 10’s experts got wrong: DR MIKE YEADON says claims that the majority of the population is susceptible to Covid, that only 7% are infected so far and virus death rate is 1% are all false
“…in the UK there are at least four known strains of coronavirus which cause the common cold. Many individuals who’ve been infected by other coronaviruses have immunity to closely related ones such as the Covid-19 virus.”
“Multiple research
Synopsis ~ Dr. Mike Yeadon Urges Against a 2nd Lockdown
The original article posted in the Daily Mail on October 30, 2020 was written by Dr. Yeadon himself. For those who may be pressed for time and just want to cut to the chase, we’ve chosen a few key sentences and phrases that cover the core issues laid out in the full article.
Three facts No 10’s experts got wrong: DR MIKE YEADON says claims that the majority of the population is susceptible to Covid, that only 7% are infected so far and virus death rate is 1% are all false
“…in the UK there are at least four known strains of coronavirus which cause the common cold. Many individuals who’ve been infected by other coronaviruses have immunity to closely related ones such as the Covid-19 virus.”
“Multiple research groups in Europe and the US have shown that around 30 per cent of the population was likely already immune to Covid-19 before the virus arrived – something which Sage continues to ignore.”
“After extensive world wide surveys, pre-eminent scientists such as John Ioannidis, professor of epidemiology at Stanford University in California, have concluded that the mortality rate is closer to 0.2 per cent. That figure means one in 500 people infected die.”
“The fact is that people don’t get reinfected. That is how the immune system works and if it didn’t, humanity would not have survived.”
“…children are rarely made ill by the virus.”
“…not only is the virus less dangerous than we are being led to believe, with almost three quarters of the population at no risk of infection, we’re actually very close to achieving herd immunity.”
groups in Europe and the US have shown that around 30 per cent of the population was likely already immune to Covid-19 before the virus arrived – something which Sage continues to ignore.”
“After extensive world wide surveys, pre-eminent scientists such as John Ioannidis, professor of epidemiology at Stanford University in California, have concluded that the mortality rate is closer to 0.2 per cent. That figure means one in 500 people infected die.”
“The fact is that people don’t get reinfected. That is how the immune system works and if it didn’t, humanity would not have survived.”
“…children are rarely made ill by the virus.”
“…not only is the virus less dangerous than we are being led to believe, with almost three quarters of the population at no risk of infection, we’re actually very close to achieving herd immunity.”
This is a selection of Posts after US Election on the exposure to determine what happened. I was actually watching the count live when the numbers started to go the other way and the count was stopped. Something was definitely wrong and I believe I was guided to switch on just at that time.
Be aware that some of these links may have disappeared as the result of the Information War by UTube, Facebook and Google.
Off we go! Lorie has a Patreon page where she’ll share more of this mmessage, but in these eight minutes she gives an encouraging condensed version about where we are right now.
As I continue to move away from political reporting, I notice that I’m not the only one receiving the message to stand back.
Many channeled sources are saying it. Here’s the Divine Mother, for example:
“What you as lightworkers and beloved loveholders have been doing is truly… and I have been urging you – except for a few whose job it is – to not engage with the recalcitrant, the… hmmm… not the fence-sitters so much but those who are truly resistant – to not, other than sending love, to not reinforce them or participate in any way, because I do not want that behaviour reinforced.
“So you have been creating for what some people are feeling – and what I have declared – an alternate pathway. Now eventually, sweet angel, these pathways reconverge, so do not think I am just throwing out half the population; I am not.
“But as you have been creating this alternative pathway, you’ve been saying to those who are on the chaos pathway, ‘Come over here; look how nice it is, look how kind it is, look how gentle it is, look how loving it is. Come over here!’” (1)
Here’s Mira, a couple of weeks back:
“Hold the light constantly and remain in the fifth dimension in your consciousness. You are the way showers. We need you to stay straight on purpose, focused on the Ascension. …
“We do not want you to energize the dark schemes with your focus or your energy. It is unproductive. Trust and believe in the divine Plan and know that it is in action. Every aspect of it is brilliant and is designed for the truth and the light to come out for all to see.” (2)
Peggy Black and the Team joined in, around the same time:
“It is most important during these times of great chaos to anchor stillness in the midst of chaos. It will take practice and your full awareness to stop your mind from engaging with the emotional issues. It will take the consciousness of the master that you are to not get plugged in to all the turmoil.” (3)
Daniel Scranton writes helpful advice:
“We have said this before, but it bears repeating; your ascension will never be about the light defeating the dark.
“The ones who are playing the roles of the villains at this time are there to give you all the opportunity to know yourselves as unconditional love, to know yourselves as Source, to know what it feels like to really forgive someone.
“You get to be the light in the face of darkness, and you get to determine for yourselves that being the light is what you prefer.
“But that’s not the narrative that you see very much of in the new age community, and that’s what you need to rise above if you are going to be the leaders that you truly are.
“If you are going to bring the healing energy that we know you can, then you have to rise above the whole idea of white hats and black hats, good and evil, and all of the other polarities that you see people writing about and talking about.
“You are there to embrace every aspect of yourself first, and anything you see outside of yourself is a part of you, just as much as it is outside of you and represented by that person, or that belief, or that heinous act.
“The way to be who you really are is to be heart-centered, to let go of grudges, resentment, hate, and everything else that weighs you down.
“The path to the fifth dimension is about taking the high road. It’s about being the best version of yourselves, and you are the best version of yourselves when you are in forgiveness, not judgment and not condemnation.” (4)
Ok, thank you, all. I’m getting the wisdom of the request at ever deeper levels. It’s sort of like supporting the white hats against the dark hats is better than supporting the dark hats, but better still – and the only thing Fifth Dimensional – is forgiving and loving all. (5)
Meanwhile take my attention off the fray and put it on Ascension (I’m speaking only for myself here). Otherwise I’m feeding the turmoil by providing energy and an audience.
The deeper I get it, the better I feel.
There are still key political events that I cannot see myself avoiding covering, but not the political scene in depth.
(5) Fifth-Dimensional love itself is not partial but universal. In my experience, it flows to whomever opens to receive it. The Fifth Dimension is marked by universality/oneness.
Stand back
Thisi is whereI I’m at and I’ve decided to concentrate on the highest possible timeline fron now on
In this latest release from Adamu he begins by discussing the forthcoming American presidential election 2020 before moving on to talk about the Coronavirus pandemic. He shares some very interesting new information including talking abut a new strain of the coronavirus that acts like a “domesticated strain”| such as they see in the Pleiades. This is crucial “don’t panic” information from Adamu.
Adamu also mentions that he and Zingdad will now begin holding “live events”!
Greetings to you, my friends. I am Adamu of the monadic entity of the Pleiadian civilisation, and I am speaking to you, as always, through my trusted friend and scribe, Zingdad.
As always, what I would like to be speaking to you about is your awakening, the elevation of your consciousness, your enlightenment. And what I am going to speak to you about is the related topics of your elections and the Corona virus and then I’m going to invite you to an interaction where we can really begin to talk about awakening and ascension.
So… elections. This is not normally a topic that I would wish to address with you. We, as the Pleiadian collective, are not normally particularly interested in the political theatre that occurs here on planet earth, because normally you are being presented with a collection of choices that are always still just fronts for the global elite, the dark cabal, the Illuminati… whatever we are calling them. Well, as of now, I find I am choosing to call them the “Delete”, the “Dark Elite”, busy being erased from this position of de facto leadership of the planet. Busy losing that status. Therefore, the “Delete”.
The elections now, in the United States, are interesting, in that this is something more than the usual political theatre. This is actually a battle, a litmus test, I suppose one could say, in the battle between two levels of consciousness. On the one hand we have the “Delete” and their deep desire to put a cap on the elevation of consciousness. To disallow humanity from rising from third density to much beyond fourth.
The fourth density of consciousness is the density of other-responsibility. At the fourth density of consciousness you are willing to place an other on a pedestal and to say, “You lead me, you teach me, you tell me what to do.” And the “Delete” offer you idols to place on those pedestals, in the form of all of their useful tools. In the form of press, the figures of authority that appear on the news. In the form of their politicians and they make a business of possessing politicians, of buying them in a variety of ways, of controlling them, of manipulating them.
Entertainment… they make a business of making sure that entertainment fits within their agenda and that the stars that you worship, your stars of entertainment, are also agents under their control. Are also possessed. And it goes deeper than that. They have been working for quite some time now to make sure that they are in control of educators, of scientists, and as always, pastors and popes, religious authorities, wherever they can, they strive to take ownership and possess and control, through a network of manipulation and control, anybody who might be seen to be somebody who would be an authority.
And so they block your consciousness from rising above other-responsibility and then they tell you who you must give your responsibility, your authority, to. And you do. And so you are led like lambs to the slaughter. You are taught and trained and controlled and manipulated. And a substantial section of human population continues to be manipulated and controlled in this way. Their consciousness continues to be held at that level, fourth density and lower, other-responsibility and lower.
But the awakening that is occurring through a variety of agencies, starseeds, light bringers, beings of higher consciousness incarnating here, iteratively, going through the pain of the shattering and now, at this time awakening, now at this time bringing new light into the human noösphere, helping you to awaken above 4D, to 5D and above, which is the consciousness of self-responsibility. And above 6D is unity consciousness. But, already at the level of self-responsibility, you look to your own authority. You look to your connection to the Divine that you find within yourself. And if you find the connection to the Divine within yourself, you’re very unlikely to place others on pedestals. You’re very unlikely to simply follow like a sheep. You become self-motivated. You know who you are. You know what’s true for you and when you see these talking heads on television, these authority figures, you listen to what they say and you start to see through the lies. You start to look more broadly for your sources of information. You start to find alternative streams of information and you have your own filter in place. You say, “This is true and that is not. I’ll go with this and that doesn’t resonate for me.” Self-responsibility dawns.
And what’s happening right now in America… I say it’s a litmus test of the battle between these two types of consciousness because the other-responsible are clearly playing the game according to the “Delete’s” wishes. They’re engaged in all kinds of dirty tricks. In all kinds of voter fraud. Creating maximum pain and chaos. Really promoting a story in your collective consciousness that everything is going to hell and that you need to get back on the bandwagon. You need to again begin to follow the leadership that is being offered to you, that the “Delete” support, or else life will become completely untenable.
So, this is what is going on right now and it’s very interesting to notice that you definitely do seem to be moving strongly towards the self-responsible timeline. When we notice that less and less of you are believing the press: something like two thirds of all respondents to a recent survey in the United States said that they find the press to be largely not believable. About one third said utterly unbelievable. So, these kinds of indications are interesting.
It will be very interesting to see what actually happens with the election, because now, as with the last election in the United States, it is a test of consciousness, but now it really matters. Those of you who have been watching carefully, those of you who have been using alternative media sources, will know that the last four years of the present Presidency have really been about putting everything in place, preparation for a seismic shift in the political landscape, in what has been happening in American politics, because there has been so much dirty business and all of this is going to be brought to the surface. It’s going to be quiet a shock for many, for those who have been attached to their other-responsible position. We see what is coming is that if you stay in the self-responsible timeline, a big shock for the other-responsibles, an opportunity for grand awakening and they may take it or they may not. It will be interesting.
I don’t want to say a lot more about the elections. They are important if you are in America; if you are an American citizen; if you are able to vote, well, make your choice appropriately. But I’m sure you already are. So this is more of just an update.
What’s also very interesting at the moment is what’s occurring with the Corona virus pandemic. What I wish to say is this, my friends. First of all, the Corona virus is a manufactured virus. Again, if you’ve been reading behind the scenes, this won’t come as a surprise for you at all. It’s a manufactured virus. It was produced in a laboratory and it’s not very difficult to guess which that laboratory was. What’s interesting is that the production of this virus was financed by the “Delete” through their agents, their tools, their minions, paid for the development of this virus. the purpose of this virus really just comes down to one thing.
Why would they manufacture this virus? They always have a number of purposes that will serve, but the primary purpose was just this: to make earth humanity clamour, beg for a vaccine. That’s the overriding, number one purpose: to make you beg for a vaccine. Why do they want you to beg for a vaccine? They want to be able to, universally, vaccinate the whole planet. Why do they want to do that? The vaccine that they have in mind, that they were in the process of developing while they were developing the virus, is a gene-therapy tool. Now, my friends, this is not something to be taken lightly.
Gene therapy… the therapy being a euphemism, the alteration of your genetic code. What is that makes you human? You’re an eternal, immortal spirit being. You are in a human body. Your body is as it is because of your genetics. That’s what makes you human, and not some other kind of physical form. You’re a human because of your genetics. If they can control your genetics, they gain vast access to controlling of all of humanity.
And what they wish to do – we’ve spoken about this just a moment ago – the capping of consciousness; keeping you below that threshold where consciousness awakens to self-responsibility and, yes, it can be done through genetic means. Your genetic code is a lot more than tour science currently, usually, represents. That is to say that most who follow what science teaches would understand that it’s purely material.
Your genetic code is a collection of amino acids that result in the building of your body and nothing else. Well, it is already understood by certain of your scientists that your genetics are far more than that, and that you can actually manipulate and control the kind of consciousness that can be held, that can be propagated in a body. And the kinds of thoughts that can easily be thought… you can limit the connection between the light body and the physical body by damaging, essentially, the genome. And this is just one of their strategies.
They really are control maniacs, the “Delete”. The want total control. They want to control you absolutely and a very powerful tool, that they are almost ready to actually implement, is by controlling your genome. And this is the purpose of the vaccine. Now, when the vaccine arrives, it probably won’t be, almost certainly won’t immediately have that dire level if activity. Their plan is, to reveal to you after the first vaccine, that, oh, we need regular boosters because your immunity doesn’t last that long towards the Corona virus and because the Corona virus mutates and now there’s a second flush coming across the earth and we need to vaccinate you again. The idea is to let you believe that each round, each vaccination, this is it but that there will always just be a booster, two, three, four per year for every single human being on planet earth, every year, into eternity. That’s their plan: total control. Placing a cap on consciousness.
Why this will fail is interesting.
First of all it fails because of the awakening in humanity.
There is certainly a sufficient percentage of human beings right now that will resist being vaccinated, just on some instinctive, intuitive level, they say, “This doesn’t seem right.” And so there will be sufficient refusal that their plans won’t work. But, to aid this, there has been a very interesting development.
And to discuss this development, I need to take a brief step back and tell you what it is that we, as the Pleiadian civilisation, what do we do when we encounter a viral agent that causes epidemic, or might potentially cause pandemic amongst our civilisation. What do we do? Do we vaccinate?
We don’t. We’ve moved beyond the point where we believe it’s necessary to have an intervention in the physical body. The bodies are intelligent. They have beautiful, intelligent immune systems, like yours. Our bodies have the same kind of mechanisms. We’re also genetic beings. We’re very similar to you in many ways. So, what we do, as soon as we discover such a problematic virus, is we take the virus into the laboratory and our technology, our understanding of genetics, DNA, RNA and so forth, is really substantially in advance of your own. I don’t wish to gloat, you’re doing very well, but we’ve had tens of thousands of years of uninterrupted development before your civilisation was even in its infancy. So, it shouldn’t come as a surprise that we really have mastered these techniques.
And what we do is we take the virus and we look at its genetics and we alter the virus’s genetics and release an altered strain, which we call a domesticated strain. You know, if you look at the dog, and you compare a domesticated dog to a wild wolf, dogs vs wolves, wild vs domesticated. Well, a wild viral strain propagates through the population and causes illness. A domesticated viral strain is far, far, far more contagious. Far more likely to propagate through the population – jumps from person to person and propagates rampantly, but is not at all damaging to your health. That’s a domesticated strain.
Now, if you think about that for just a moment, the domesticated strain will completely outcompete the wild strain because it’s far more contagious, but you don’t mind, because when you catch it, it causes negligible harm. There is an immune response. Naturally. Your body recognises, here’s a virus. Your body knows what viruses are. In your case, the Corona virus. The Corona virus is a mutated member of a family of viruses which your body knows so well. You have colds which are caused by Corona viruses. They are of the same family. Your body knows what a Corona virus is. So, if your immune system is functioning and if you’re nominally healthy, and you got the wild strain, you would probably be fine. You’d get ill, not feel well, but you’d get over it.
If you get the domesticated strain, you have, perhaps, a day or two, three at the outside, of your body’s immune system responding, coping, producing its own antibodies, doing its beautiful, genius thing that it does, which is responding to such a threat. So, this is what we do and this is why we actually, when we have a viral strain like that, we actually pass around little vials and we willingly, knowingly, take a few days off and infect ourselves with the domesticated strain and life goes on. So, that’s a domesticated strain. Now, by some, let’s call it miraculous divine intervention, there seems to be, what very much appears to be a domesticated strain doing the rounds on planet earth right now. Which means the Corona virus has gone from being a threat to becoming less and less of a threat.
The wild virus is still out there and there are still many human beings with terrible co-morbidities, people who are very ill with all kinds of things, and there is still, at this point a powerful political agenda to drive your demand for a vaccine. So, you are being lied to, wholesale, about the impact and the effect of the Corona virus.
People who die of other things, you are being told they died of Corona virus. The test that is used – the PCR test – is not intended to be used in this way – you get false positives. In every possible way, you are being manipulated to continue to demand the vaccine. It’s no longer necessary. If the vaccines were produced by really trustworthy laboratories, whose intentions were absolutely the purest, then I’d say there might be a case for a very small section of the population, those who we know to be at risk, to be vaccinated.
The people who have real health problems, people who are old, obese, people who are struggling with problems of the heart, the lungs, the vascular system, there’s a case to be made that an ethically crafted vaccine could be used. But, for the rest of the population, given everything that’s going on, given the medicines that are available if you get it, that you don’t get too ill. Given all that, given what’s know, if the medical fraternity and the so-called World Health Organization were truly all operating from a place of integrity and honesty and authenticity for the greatest good of all of humanity, then there would not be a push, at all, for global vaccinations. So, that then is my update on the subject of the Corona virus.
My friends, there is so much going on and we are able to have this conversation and things are able to proceed as they are because the “Delete” are in as much trouble as they are.
They’re a many-headed monster. In mythology there was a beast called a hydra, a creature of many heads. That’s what they are: they’re a many-headed monster. Up until some time, fairly recently, there was one head that bound the others to its will and was controlling this monster and so it was working in concert, working together for total domination and control of the planet. That head has been decapitated. If you want to know about that, we have spoken about that. It was called, The Story of the Ancient Red Vampire. Have a look at that if you haven’t already.
But, as a consequence, there are now many heads and they’re not all playing together. They form temporary alliances. Those alliances break and shift and they attack each other and there’s internal conflict and that’s why they keep dropping the ball. That’s why it was possible, in the last election, in the United States for an agent that doesn’t serve them, for an agent not of the “Delete” to win the election. That’s why it’s possible that it’s going to happen again. That’s why Brexit could happen and so many of these difficulties that the “Delete” have been struggling with, all stem, really, from the decapitation of their previous head.
So, my friends, what I’d like to say, in closing is that we will be having live events. I will be speaking through Zingdad at live events, coming soon. Live, through the Internet, so not recorded like this format is, but speaking to you in person. If you’d like to join in that, those events will be, finally, to talk about awakening and the elevation of consciousness. To talk about your transformation. To talk about discovering the Divine within, to help you to find that; to help you to bring your own Divine light into your being. So, raising consciousness from self-responsible up to Unity consciousness. So, what we will be doing is addressing this in a number of ways: meditating together and having deep conversations together about awakening. It’s really time for us to move the conversation in that direction.
So, as always a fairly lengthy update from me. I look forward to our shared live events. Stay tuned, Zingdad will be announcing that soon. Until then, stay strong. You’re doing beautifully.
I love you all with the heart of Oneness. I am Adamu of the monadic entity of the Pleaidian civilisation and I have been coming, as always, to you through my dear friend and scribe, Zingdad.
Basic Scientific and Political Principles Applied to COVID-19
Public health experts and policymakers believe that they can estimate what is scientifically required to fight a pandemic and that their personally determined requirements override most or all other considerations.
But as a physician, psychiatrist, and researcher who has spent more than fifty years writing and evaluating research studies, I can explain why public health experts and officials are vastly more limited in their scientific knowledge than they admit.
As other experts will confirm in this report,2 there is no historical precedent and no scientific basis to the ever-changing pronouncements by public health officials that have driven this nation into a state of fearful lockdown.
Nearly every policy and practice—from closing of schools and the stay-at-home orders to the use of various medications and respirators—is subject to varied and conflicting scientific opinion, and to an overall lack of sound data.
The opinions being expressed with such authority come from people who have, for much of their lives, held themselves out as the last final word in their fields—but that does not make their opinions scientifically sound. In fact, the very word “authority” should never be uttered in the same breath with “scientific.”
There are no “scientific authorities”—there is the body of research and opinion, always conflicted, forever evolving, with innumerable individuals searching for and comparing their versions of empirical truth. The idea of “scientific authority” is a fiction created by media analysts and politicians seeking seemingly superior experts to bolster their preconceived biases and opinions.
Given the current state of their science, all that public health scientists can do is to present us with their best guesstimates at the moment about risk/benefit ratios—for example, “If the schools are closed, it may or may not make things worse, but here’s my best guestimate.”
And of course, there will always be another expert to give a starkly opposing best guesstimate. I have purposely used the vague term “make things worse,” because that is really what is at stake when we enforce radical, untried policies on a crisis like COVID-19.
Experts who favor top-down government control will try to predict something more precise, such as “Closing the schools will temporarily decrease the spread of the pandemic.” But they never then ask the most important question, “Will closing the schools make things better or worse for our children, their families, and society?”
They do not try to answer that question because they cannot do it. It is too complex a question considering what it means to children to lose months of their education, to be cut off from their friends, and to miss all the social, academic, athletic and sometimes religious projects associated with school.
The experts cannot factor in the increased social withdrawal, loneliness, conflict with parents, anxiety, depression, and suicide that we are witnessing among our children. Nor can they consider the effect on parents who have to stay home to take care of the children and maybe their own parents as well. And, of course, they cannot estimate the impact on a society whose children are being changed forever.
Indeed, this writer cannot even begin to summarize all the vast, rippling effects of the current school closures, let alone make some “scientific prediction.” I can only say, along with many others, “It looks to me like its making things much, much worse,and especially so for our most vulnerable children who have disabilities, have disturbed or alcoholic parents, and who live in poverty. Those kids really miss school!”
Typical of all behavioral sciences that try to deal with huge populations, predictions are at the least partially speculative, because they deal with human choice and conduct, infinite variables, unknown factors, and rapidly changing conditions.
Add a mutating virus to the mix, and the difficulties of prediction become mind-boggling. Add the complexity of political interventions and unanticipated confounding events… perhaps their “scientific” guesses are no better than yours or mine, as so often seems to happen. But the fact is that there are insufficient epidemiological studies upon which to base any of the opinions offered.
What can we conclude from this analysis of the limits of current public health “science” in respect to managing COVID-19? The only sensible conclusion is to proceed with caution, to do as little harm as possible, and to respect the rights of our citizens.
Over 185,000 viewers were concurrently watching the stream when it aired live Monday afternoon.
The event, hosted by the organization America’s Frontline Doctors, a group founded by Dr. Simone Gold, a board-certified physician and attorney, and made up of medical doctors, came together to address what the group calls a “massive disinformation campaign” about the coronavirus. Norman also spoke at the event.
“If Americans continue to let so-called experts and media personalities make their decisions, the great American experiment of a Constitutional Republic with Representative Democracy, will cease,” reads the event’s information page.
The event was organized and sponsored by the Tea Party Patriots.
“We’ve removed this video for sharing false information about cures and treatments for COVID-19,” a Facebook company spokesman, Andy Stone, told Breitbart News. The company did not specify what portion of the video it ruled to be “false information,” who it consulted to make that ruling, and on what basis it was made.
Stone replied to New York Times tech columnist Kevin Roose on Twitter regarding the video:
Yes, we removed it for sharing false information about cures and treatments for COVID-19.
Stone then added that the platform would direct users who had interacted with the post to information on “myths debunked by the WHO.”
Also, one other thing to note. We’re showing messages in News Feed to people who have reacted to, commented on or shared harmful COVID-19-related misinformation that we have removed, connecting them to myths debunked by the WHO.
Facebook’s decision to censor the livestream was quickly followed by YouTube, the Google-owned video-sharing platform. The video had over 80,000 views on YouTube prior to its removal.
Following Facebook and YouTube’s removal of the video, Twitter followed suit, removing Breitbart News’s Periscope livestream of the press conference. Jack Dorsey’s platform also then limited the Breitbart News official account, indicating that tweets containing links to multiple stories about the press conference violate the platform’s COVID-19 policies.
From the outset of the Coronavirus pandemic, and the lockdown regimes that followed, we have been repeatedly told, by all the usual suspects, institutions and the mainstream media, that the only way to get back to normal is with a vaccine; precisely echoing the calls of the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation.
Certainly, the UK government was quick to invest in vaccine development. In their Coronavirus Action Plan, published on 3 March, the focus was overwhelmingly on vaccines. The Action Plan noted that a vaccine may not prevent infection from SARS-Cov-2 but could rather manage symptoms of the potentially resultant syndrome, COVID-19:
Given that there is currently neither a vaccine against COVID-19 nor any specific, proven, antiviral medication, most treatment will therefore be towards managing symptoms … innovate responses including diagnostics, drugs and vaccines …
This notion that a proposed vaccine may not actually stop SARS-CoV-2 infections, but rather manage symptoms of COVID-19, was clearly signalled by Pascal Soriot (CEO of AstraZeneca), who are partnering with Oxford University to develop a SARS-CoV-2 vaccine. Speaking on the BBC’s Andrew Marr Show on 24 May, Soriot stated:
We are quite confident the vaccine will work, actually. The question is, will it completely clear the virus or stop people being sick … This is what happens with the flu vaccine, for instance … It simply stops people from being sick … Being protected against being sick would already be a big plus.
Bill Gates and Boris Johnson were the keynote speakers at the summit. In his address, Johnson stated:
I want to say a particular thank you to Bill and Melinda Gates for their generosity, their philanthropy, yet again, and their continued leadership in humanity’s battle against disease … Just as we have great military alliances like NATO … so we now need that same spirit of collaboration and collective defence against the common enemy of disease … It will require a new international effort to co-operate on the surveillance and sharing of information that can underpin a global alert system … it will need a radical scaling-up of our global capacity to respond, exactly as Bill [Gates] has set out.
As Johnson’s comments reveal, there is much more than just healthcare riding on the back of Coronavirus vaccine development. The vaccine itself sits at the centre of a web of surveillance, restricted freedom of movement and restricted access to employment and services based upon your allocated immunity status.
A whole new tech industry, combining global corporations and intelligence agencies, is springing up to monitor, control and surveil populations. Perhaps we could call this the “disease intelligence industrial complex.”
A Vaccine That Doesn’t Need To Work
Johnson’s Coronavirus Action Plan announcement followed the World Health Organisation’s February summit with the Global Research Collaboration for Infectious Disease Preparedness and Response (GLOPID-R).
GLOPID-R’s list of funding organisations, with significant financial interests in vaccine sales, is notable. For example, there is the Gates Foundation, the Coalition for Epidemic Preparedness Innovation (CEPI), the Wellcome Trust, and the French medical research agency Inserm (Institut national de la santé et de la recherche médicale).
The two-day WHO / GLOPID-R summit took place on 11-12 February. One month later, on 11 March, the WHO declared a global coronavirus pandemic. The summit produced the Target Product Profile (TPP) which needs to be met in order for the WHO to approve any proposed COVID-19 vaccine.
The WHO would prefer that the vaccine prevent SARS-CoV-2 infections, but it doesn’t have to, so long as it reduces the worst effects of COVID-19. It doesn’t need to be 100% effective either; 70% is fine.
Since, at the time of writing, COVID-19 is said to have impacted 0.1% of the global population, allegedly killing less than 0.006%, the WHO’s measure of success for a global vaccine being that it protect 70% of the global population from a disease that doesn’t affect 99.9% of the population, the chances of WHO approval for anything look pretty good — an inert saline solution should do the job. It is not surprising, then, that vaccine developers are so confidently looking forward to a global market and global profits.
A cheap, widely available off-patent drug that achieves exactly the same thing as the vaccine must, therefore, be seen as a problem.
Why Not Hydroxychloroquine?
When the world is presented with a virus which is claimed to cause a potentially fatal disease for which there is no known treatment, and if our only claimed wish is to “save lives,” trialling any and all potential treatments makes obvious sense.
Resistance to trials would suggest that saving life may not be the priority. If the evidence shows that powerful public health bodies and foundations have apparently colluded to stop trials, there can be little doubt another agenda has taken precedence over saving lives.
When the WHO declared a global pandemic, chloroquine, and its modern form hydroxychloroquine, were the most obvious candidates for investigative clinical trials. Its possible effectiveness had, after all, been noted since at least 2005.
Scientists at Stanford University agreed, reporting apparent treatment success in both China and South Korea. The Stanford team also advocated more thorough clinical trials of chloroquine and hydroxychloroquine.
Yet resistance to trialling hydroxychloroquine was immediately evident. Raoult was attacked in France for suggesting hydroxychloroquine could work to prevent the most severe, life-threatening, symptoms of COVID-19. These attacks, which we would characterise as a disinformation campaign, came from the mainstream media, other scientists who worked for Inserm, and politicians.
The persistent claim, repeated ad nauseam by the mainstream media, that hydroxychloroquine presents some sort of severe heart risk, simply isn’t true.
There is virtually no cardiovascular risk at all to taking it, as recommended, for short-course treatments — as you would if you took it as a prophylaxis for COVID-19.
The case fatality rate (CFR) for the oldest COVID-19 patients has been reported to rise to more than 14%. Raoult’s largest field study, of more than one thousand patients treated with hydroxychloroquine, showed that the CFR for the oldest patients dropped to 0.5%.
Raoult is by no means the only scientist or doctor to have seemingly proven the efficacy of hydroxychloroquine for treating COVID-19; especially as a prophylactic.
There is theoretical, experimental, preclinical and clinical evidence of the effectiveness of chloroquine in patients affected with COVID-19. There is adequate evidence of drug safety from the long-time clinical use of chloroquine and hydroxychloroquine.
However, if we were to rely on the MSM for our information, we would not know any of this. Why are they apparently so eager to convince us that hydroxychloroquine is harmful? Why are the WHO, Inserm and the UK’s Medicines and Healthcare Products Regulatory Agency (MHRA) determined that hydroxychloroquine trials won’t proceed?
The Problem With Hydroxychloroquine
The leading scientific advocates of hydroxychloroquine recommend that it should primarily be used in the early stages of COVID-19, or even prior to developing the syndrome, as a prophylactic. Should the person develop the symptoms of COVID-19, they could, for example, begin a course of what has become known as the Marseilles Treatment: hydroxychloroquine with the antibiotic azithromycin (HCQ+AZ) plus zinc to aid absorption.
Struggling to comprehend the seemingly inexplicable resistance to trialling HCQ+AZ, Prof. Harvey Risch, MD, from Yale University, argued that HCQ+AZ should immediately be used as an early therapy for COVID-19 patients. He wrote:
Hydroxychloroquine+azithromycin has been widely misrepresented in both clinical reports and public media…..Five studies, including two controlled clinical trials, have demonstrated significant major outpatient treatment efficacy……These medications need to be widely available and promoted immediately for physicians to prescribe.
His is far from the only eminently qualified opinion questioning the irrational blocking of treatment with hydroxychloroquine. In Michigan, the Association of American Physicians and Surgeons (AAPS) have launched an appeal against an FDA injunction to allow them to prescribe hydroxychloroquine for their COVID-19 patients.
The WHO’s Solidarity Trials to test hydroxychloroquine were launched on 18 March. The WHO stated that four hundred hospitals in thirty-five countries had recruited 3,500 patients to take part. At the same time, the WHO launched its Solidarity Trial for potential vaccines.
The UK government did not take part in the WHO’s Solidarity trials, instead running their own Recovery Trial and separate COPCOV and PRINCIPLE trials.
The Recovery Trial’s core funding comes from the Gates Foundation, Wellcome Trust and Oxford University, among others. Oxford University is running vaccine trials, in partnership with AstraZeneca. The Recovery Trial was not investigating the prophylactic potential of hydroxychloroquine.
The COPCOV trial was due to assess hydroxychloroquine’s prophylactic efficacy in protecting healthcare workers against contracting COVID-19.
The PRINCIPLE trial was perhaps the most relevant of all. Vulnerable over-fifties, and people over 65, were to be offered hydroxychloroquine in a large-cohort study of patients in primary care (GP practices and community care settings).
In France, Inserm ran its own Discovery Trials in parallel with the WHO’s Solidarity Trials. Again, they were only assessing hydroxychloroquine in isolation, for the most ill patients. Only the UK’s COPCOV and PRINCIPLE trials were assessing potential preventive efficacy. COPCOV also had an international arm.
However, none was trialling the recommended Marseilles Treatment.
Initially Inserm refused point-blank to trial hydroxychloroquine at all. Four days before the launch of the WHO’s Solidarity Trials, Prof. Yazdan Yazdanpanah, head of France’s health emergency rapid response committee (REACTing — REsearch and ACTion targeting emerging infectious diseases) stated that the Discovery Trials would exclude chloroquine (hydroxychloroquine) and would only trial patented drugs:
We have not retained it [hydroxychloroquine] for the moment, in particular because of its undesirable effects. It also has frequent interactions with other drugs. However, intensive care patients are often treated with multiple drugs.
This followed a decision on 15 January, made by the then French Minister of Solidarity and Health, Agnès Buzyn, to reclassify hydroxychloroquine in all its forms as a poisonous substance.
Prior to this decision, for more than fifty years, the French had been able to buy hydroxychloroquine over the counter. Once demand shot through the roof, as the COVID-19 crisis unfolded, they suddenly could no longer get it without a prescription.
With the WHO initially including hydroxychloroquine in their Solidarity Trials, Inserm had little option but to reluctantly include it in their Discovery Trials on Solidarity launch day, 22 March. Inserm stated in its press release:
We analyzed the data from the scientific literature concerning the SARS and MERS coronaviruses as well as the first publications on SARS-COV2 from China to arrive at a list of antiviral molecules to be tested: remdesivir, lopinavir in combination with ritonavir…….and hydroxychloroquine. The list of these potential drugs is also based on the list of experimental treatments classified as priorities by the World Health Organization.
This can be seen as little more than disingenuous back-peddling. The data from the scientific literature hadn’t changed in the space of a few days. If REACTing previously considered the hydroxychloroquine risks too high, no new evidence had emerged to alter that assessment.
Hydroxychloroquine Trials Abandoned for No Reason At All
Within days of the hydroxychloroquine trials starting, on 22 May The Lancetpublished a study by a team of four U.S. researchers from Brigham and Women’s Hospital Center for Advanced Heart Disease. The paper alleged that hydroxychloroquine presented too high a risk of ventricular arrhythmia and potentially increased mortality for COVID-19 patients.
We knew this already but physician scientists internationally are now speaking out. This article is long but goes into much detail on the bioweapon that Covid-19 is and the other pandemics are as well.
It concludes: “the pandemic will naturally extinguish itself because of its synthetic origins.”
Nobel Laureate Luc Antoine Montagnier said on French media that COVID-19 was manmade, contains elements of HIV and a parasite that causes malaria, and resulted from an industrial accident during HIV vaccine development
Montagnier says the COVID-19 virus pandemic will likely end from “interfering waves” because nature rejects molecular tampering
In a paper on Center for Open Science, Montagnier and his colleague, bio-mathematician Jean-Claude Perez, say COVID-19 mutations suggest the virus is deleting the inserted, manmade elements
In the Quarterly Review of Biophysics, Norwegian scientist Birger Sørensen and British oncologist Angus Dalgleish also call COVID-19 manmade
An investigation by The Times of London reveals many questions about COVID-19’s origins and shocking cover-ups
The explanations of COVID-19’s origins by mainstream media simply do not add up and scientists are increasingly speaking out about this. Many experts theorize that the virus is manmade and was synthesized in a laboratory because the peculiarities of the virus’ genome that make it so transmittable could not have occurred in nature.
Experts who suspect COVID-19 has lab origins have strong evidence on their side. Research between the Wuhan Institute of Virology in China and University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill to increase the infectivity and deadliness of a SARS-like coronavirus has indeed been conducted.1
The coronavirus experimental collaborations, called “gain-of-function” (GOF) research, were curtailed by the U.S. between 2014 and 2018 because of their obvious risks, but in 2017 the NIH announced the research would be resumed.2
Scientists willing to challenge the mainstream explanations of COVID-19’s origin face a backlash from their colleagues and scientific associations and have even been dismissed as “conspiracy theorists.” However, a new voice has been added to the body of scientific dissenters that will likely add to the credibility of their COVID-19 viewpoints.
French virologist Luc Antoine Montagnier, who was awarded a Nobel prize in Physiology in 2008 along with Françoise Barré-Sinoussi and Harald zur Hausen for discovering of the HIV virus,3 has now spoken out. Montagnier was a researcher at the prestigious Pasteur Institute in Paris.4
COVID-19 Was Manmade, Says Nobel Laureate
Many in the scientific community were shocked when the acclaimed Luc Antoine Montagnier appeared on the French cable TV show, CNews, on April 17, 20205 to say that the virus that causes COVID-19 is manmade and that elements of HIV and Plasmodium falciparum, a parasite that causes malaria, are found in the coronavirus’s genome.6 Montagnier said:7
“We were not the first since a group of Indian researchers tried to publish a study which showed that the complete genome of this coronavirus [has] sequences of another virus, which is HIV.”
The research that Montagnier refers to was posted on the science website Biorxiv January 31, 2020, and has since been withdrawn. The researchers wrote:8
“We found 4 insertions in the spike glycoprotein (S) which are unique to the 2019-nCoV and are not present in other coronaviruses. Importantly, amino acid residues in all the 4 inserts have identity or similarity to those in the HIV-1 gp120 or HIV-1 Gag …
The finding of 4 unique inserts in the 2019-nCoV, all of which have identity /similarity to amino acid residues in key structural proteins of HIV-1 is unlikely to be fortuitous in nature.”
COVID-19 Derives From a Failed HIV Vaccine, Says Montagnier
In a separate appearance on the French podcast Pourquoi Docteur, also April 17,9 Montagnier said the coronavirus had escaped in an “industrial accident” while Chinese scientists at the Wuhan city laboratory were trying to develop a vaccine against HIV.10 “In order to insert an HIV sequence into this genome, molecular tools are needed, and that can only be done in a laboratory,” said Montagnier.11
Montagnier also said he believes that the pandemic will naturally extinguish itself because of its synthetic origins:12
“Nature does not accept any molecular tinkering, it will eliminate these unnatural changes and even if nothing is done, things will get better, but unfortunately after many deaths.”
According to the website Corvelva, Montagnier said on the podcast that the pandemic would peter out because nature would override the synthetically inserted sequences that make COVID-19 so deadly:13
“With the help of interfering waves, we could eliminate these sequences … and consequently stop the pandemic. But it would take many means available.”
Montagnier Created His Theory With a Biomathematics Expert
Montagnier says he reached his conclusions, “With my colleague, biomathematician Jean-Claude Perez,” after they “carefully analyzed the description of the genome of this RNA virus.”14 Montagnier’s partner, Perez, is a French interdisciplinary scientist and biomathematics expert.15
According to an online bio, Perez has proved that DNA coding for genes is structured by proportions related to Fibonacci numbers,16 which are formulas in mathematics that are sometimes called “nature’s secret code.”17 In a paper Montagnier and Perez published on the Center for Open Science in April 2020, they write:18
“Using our proprietary bio-mathematic approach we are able to evaluate the level of cohesion and organization of a genome; … we then searched in this genome for possible traces of HIV or even SIV [related simian immunodeficiency virus]. A first publication reports the discovery of 6 HIV SIV RNA pieces.”
The HIV and SIV elements that Montagnier and Perez detect, called Exogenous Informative Elements, or EIEs, provide the basis of their theory that COVID-19 is not a simple derivative of SARS and bat-related viruses. They write:19
“A major part of these 16 EIE already existed in the first SARS genomes as early as 2003. However, we demonstrate how and why a new region including 4 HIV1 HIV2 Exogenous Informative Elements radically distinguishes all COVID-19 strains from all SARS and Bat strains …
… a contiguous region representing 2.49% of the whole COVID-19 genome is 40.99% made up of 12 diverse EIE originating from various strains of HIV SIV retroviruses …
a novel long region of around 225 nucleotides, appears to us to be totally new: this region is completely absent in ALL SARS genomes, whereas it is present and 100% homologous for all COVID-19 genomes listed in NCBI or GISAID COVID_19 genomic databases.”
More About Montagnier and Perez’s Theory
After in-depth sequencing of related genomes from many different countries, regions of countries and time periods using their proprietary biomathematic approach, Montagnier and Perez say their research enabled them to:20
“… demonstrate how and why a new region including 4 HIV/SIV EIE radically distinguishes all COVID- 19 strains from all SARS and Bat strains.”
They also find the presence of plasmodium yoelii in the COVID-19 genome, a parasite used in studies of “mice vaccine strategies.” This is another EIE not originally in the SARS and bat-related viruses, say Montagnier and Perez.21
“An analysis of amino acid homologies confirms the very probable insertion of this EIE [plasmodium yoelii] in COVID-19.”
As they decode the genomes of myriad COIVID-19 “relatives” in their research paper, Montagnier and Perez detect mutations in which the viruses seem to be trying to “rid” themselves of the exogenous EIEs, which the researchers believe were inserted deliberately.22
The virus mutations seem to verify Montagnier’s Pourquoi Docteur podcast predictions about how nature will eliminate “unnatural changes” — the reason he is hopeful the pandemic will come to a natural ending.23
Other Researchers Agree With Montagnier and Perez
Since Montagnier’s comments to French media, other researchers have agreed that COVID-19 appears manmade, with insertions that hint at lab construction. In June 2020, research published in the Quarterly Review of Biophysics makes similar claims.24 Norwegian scientist Birger Sørensen and British oncologist Angus Dalgleish refer to COVID-19 as a “chimeric virus” and write:25
“We show the non-receptor dependent phagocytic general method of action to be specifically related to cumulative charge from inserted sections placed on the SARS-CoV-2 Spike surface in positions to bind efficiently by salt bridge formations; and from blasting the Spike we display the non human-like epitopes from which Biovacc-19 has been down-selected.”
While conceding the Quarterly Review of Biophysics assertions were controversial, the scientific website Minerva wrote that the science should be pursued.26
“Minerva has read a draft of the article, and has after an overall assessment decided that the findings and arguments do deserve public debate, and that this discussion cannot depend entirely on the publication process of scientific journals.”
Like Montagnier, Sørensen’s background is HIV research work and he launched a new immunotherapy for HIV in 2008 that was acclaimed.27 In an interview with Minerva about his recent contentious research, he says:28
“We have examined which components of the virus are especially well suited to attach themselves to cells in humans. And we have done this by comparing the properties of the virus with human genetics. What we found was that this virus was exceptionally well adjusted to infect humans … So well that it was suspicious.”
The Sunday Times of London Weighs In
I previously interviewed virologist Jonathan Latham, and he expanded on his uncovering of this nondisclosed Wuhan virus. You can see more in the video below.
There are many unexplained circumstances surrounding the discovery and spread of COVID-19, which inspired The Times of London to launch an in-depth investigation that was recently published.29 For example, the newspaper notes that a virus similar to COVID-19 appeared on the scene much earlier than was reported.30
“The world’s closest known relative to the Covid-19 virus was found in 2013 by Chinese scientists in an abandoned mine where it was linked to deaths caused by a coronavirus-type respiratory illness.”
Among the many unanswered questions was why the deaths of six men in China in 2012, who had been exposed to a bat virus and quickly developed severe pneumonia, were covered up by Chinese authorities. According to The Times:31
“All the men were linked. They had been given the task of clearing out piles of bat feces in an abandoned copper mine in the hills south of the town of Tongguan … Some had worked for two weeks before falling ill, and others just a few days … while none had tested positive for SARS, all four had antibodies against another, unknown Sars-like coronavirus.”
A research paper titled “Coexistence of Multiple Coronaviruses in Several Bat Colonies in an Abandoned Mineshaft,” cowritten by Shi Zhengli, a researcher known in China as the “Bat Woman,” makes “no mention of why the study had been carried out: the miners, their pneumonia and the deaths,” says the Times.32
The deaths from the apparently new bat-related respiratory virus were also blacked out by Chinese media, says The Times, and could only be gleaned from a “master’s thesis by a young medic called Li Xu.”33
Adding to the many questions about the virus’ origins, wrote The Times, was the fact that “of the 41 patients who contracted Covid-19 in Wuhan only 27” had contact with the Huanan seafood market, which was officially named as the source. Moreover, a longtime bat researcher exposed to bat blood and urine who subsequently fell ill and might have been “patient zero” refused to talk to reporters.34
Thanks to the “gain-of-function” research that was conducted at the Wuhan Institute of Virology, well-founded fears of escaped or leaked viruses preceded the acknowledgement of COVID-19 and were increased by China’s lack of transparency. For example, wrote The Times, even the fact that COVID-19 could be spread between humans was hidden:35
“China would not admit there had been human-to-human transmission until January 20, despite sitting on evidence the virus had been passed to medics.”
The True Nature of COVID-19 Remains Hidden
According to The Times, a sample of the virus that killed six in 2012 was housed at the Wuhan Institute of Virology and was described in a scientific paper cowritten by Shi that states it is a 96.2% match to the COVID-19 virus.36 The virus, called RaTG13, says The Times:
“… was the biggest lead available as to the origin of Covid-19. It was therefore surprising that the paper gave only scant detail about the history of the virus sample, stating merely that it was taken from a Rhinolophus affinis bat in Yunnan province in 2013 — hence the “Ra” and the 13.
Inquiries have established, however, that RaTG13 is almost certainly the coronavirus discovered in the abandoned mine in 2013, which had been named RaBtCoV/4991 in the institute’s earlier scientific paper. For some reason, Shi and her team appear to have renamed it.”
According to The Times, the obfuscation about how long the virus has been known to exist and its origins continues. In an interview with Scientific American, says The Times, Shi:37
“… mentions the discovery of a coronavirus that 96% matches the Covid-19 virus, and has a reference to the miners dying in a cave she investigated. However, the two things are not linked and Shi downplays the significance of the miners’ deaths by claiming they succumbed to a fungus.”
Was COVID-19 Created in a Lab?
With the many cover-ups and misleading information surrounding the coronavirus and resulting pandemic, is it possible COVID-19 came from a lab and was manmade? On this point, The Times is agnostic.38
“The final and trickiest question for the WHO inspectors [who investigated the virus in China] is whether the virus might have escaped from a laboratory in Wuhan. Is it possible, for example, that RaTG13 or a similar virus turned into Covid-19 and then leaked into the population after infecting one of the scientists at the Wuhan institute?
This seriously divides the experts. The Australian virologist Edward Holmes has estimated that RaTG13 would take up to 50 years to evolve the extra 4% that would make it a 100% match with the Covid-19 virus.”
Most of the mainstream media as well as the scientific community continue to dismiss such ideas. But the addition of the voices of a Nobel Laureate and well-known Norwegian researcher give the theory greater credibility. There are other questions unexplored by media, too.
Was COVID-19 Intended as a Bioweapon?
If COVID-19 were manmade and leaked from a laboratory, there is another pressing question. Was the synthesized virus intended as a bioweapon? In a published paper, Dr. Meryl Nass, a board-certified internist and biological warfare epidemiologist,39 wrote that such genetic engineering techniques have “resulted in biological weapons that were tested, well-described and, in some cases, used.”40
Many are unaware of just how many Biological Safety Levels (BSL) 3 and 4 labs there are in the world. They are found in the U.S., China, Argentina, Australia, Brazil, Canada, The Czech Republic, France, Gabon, Germany, Hungary, India, Italy, Russia, South Africa, Sweden, Switzerland, Taiwan and the United Kingdom.41 People are also unaware of how often leaks occur.
For example, in 2017 at the BSL 4 lab on Galveston Island, there were serious questions about what happened to pathogens housed there after it was hit by a massive storm and severe flooding.42 Only two years later, the BSL 4 lab in Fort Detrick, Maryland, was temporarily shut down after protocol violations.43
When Hurricane Katrina struck in 2005, the greater New Orleans area housed at least five BSL 3 labs that were studying anthrax, HIV, SARS, West Nile and genetically engineered mouse pox. According to The Daily Bruin:44
“The National Primate Research Center, located at Tulane, housed nearly 5,000 monkeys in outdoor cages for ‘infectious disease, including biodefense-related work, gene therapy, reproductive biology and neuroscience,’ according to an article inTulane University Magazine.”
The CDC Has Had Several BSL Safety Breaches and Accidents
Even the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention has had leaks in its home-based Atlanta facility. In June 2012, the agency made headline news when an inspector reported that a building housing anthrax, SARS and monkeypox in one of its bioterror labs had a noticeable air leak. This was following similar reports in 2007 and 2008. Of the 2012 incident, ABC News said:45
“The documents suggest a breach in biosafety regulations, imposed nationwide by the CDC itself, that dictate labs housing the most dangerous inhalable infectious agents must be maintained under ‘negative pressure.’”
The CDC just seems to keep having accidents. For example, in June 2014, the CDC released a public statement46 stating “… approximately 75 Atlanta-based staff are being monitored after being exposed to live anthrax when … established safety practices were not followed.”
The CDC then pledged to do internal reviews of lab-safety policies and procedures. Six months later, in December 2014, Reuters47 reported that the CDC had created a new, high-level safety position to “identify problems, establish plans to solve them, and hold programs throughout CDC accountable for follow-up.”
But, in 2016, it happened again: Problems in an Atlanta BSL-4 lab working “with deadly Ebola and smallpox viruses and other pathogens that lack vaccines or reliable treatments” developed when safety seals and backup safety measures on its labs failed.48
In reporting on this incident, USA Today obtained copies of reports from a 2009 incident, and learned that certain CDC officials tried to hide the problems. USA Today asked Richard Ebright, a Rutgers University biosafety expert who has testified before Congress on these issues, to look at the reports and to give his opinion on the CDC’s actions. Ebright said:
“Overall, the incident shows that failures — even cascading, compounding, catastrophic failures of BSL-4 biocontainment labs occur … And the attempted cover-up within the CDC makes it clear that the CDC cannot be relied upon to police its own, much less other institutions.”
The CDC responded that “there was never any risk posed by the lab’s equipment failures.” What other accidents have we yet to hear about? If we are ever going to get a handle on this, we must listen to the experts on this topic, many whom I have interviewed. Although there may have been some valid research taking place at one time, most of these bioweapon labs are dangerous and should be shut down.
5th February 2021. Mike Quinsey.
The original article posted in the Daily Mail on October 30, 2020 was written by Dr. Yeadon himself. For those who may be pressed for time and just want to cut to the chase, we’ve chosen a few key sentences and phrases that cover the core issues laid out in the full article.
As I continue to move away from political reporting, I notice that I’m not the only one receiving the message to stand back.
by Arn Allingham (Zingdad), October 9, 2020
Thanks to Brian.
Events are happening again faster than we can write articles on, so we’re switching back to a summary format for some articles.
The Hydroxychloroquine Scandal
christinedeacon2 