Gallery: Today, Dec. 22, 2021

Today, Dec. 22, 2021

December 22, 2021 by 

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

My thanks to Len, D, and Brian, the fruits of whose research make up these pages

Dr. Simone Gold Summarizes the Situation We Face ConstitutionallyVideo Player

Dr. Gold shows a vignette in which Dr. Fauci repeatedly says the vaccines are very effective, followed by news stories of the vaccines effectiveness, followed by more stories each saying the vaccine is less effective and less effective.  Now we know their “effectiveness” goes down over time until (I believe) they leave the individual immune-deficient.

She quotes a statement that Nikita Krushchev made about how to do a Marxist takeover of America without firing a shot. It has four stages: Demoralization, disorientation, crisis, and a promise of normalization.  She details how we have been taken through these stages.

Too bad it’s not in the Mother’s Plan.

Deadly Typhoon Rai Batters Philippines in Same Area as 2013 Typhoon

Rai, also known as Super Typhoon Odette in the Philippines, is the 15th typhoon to hit the Philippines this year. Rai was a Category 5 storm with 160 mph winds at landfall and with gusts over 185 miles per hour. Rai made nine landfalls in the Philippines and caused widespread destruction.

(Gateway Pundit at PlayerVideo PlayerVideo Player

The Nuremberg Code

Common Ground, 18/11/2021(

United States of America v. Karl Brandt, et al. (also known as the Doctors’ trial), Nuremberg, Germany. Defendants seated under guard in the dock behind the defense counsel during the Doctors Trial, which was held in Nuremberg, Germany, from December 9, 1946, to August 20, 1947.

The Nuremberg Military Tribunal’s decision in the case of the United States v Karl Brandt et al. includes what is now called the Nuremberg Code, a ten point statement delimiting permissible medical experimentation on human subjects. According to this statement, humane experimentation is justified only if its results benefit society and it is carried out in accord with basic principles that “satisfy moral, ethical, and legal concepts.” To some extent the Nuremberg Code has been superseded by the Declaration of Helsinki as a guide for human experimentation.

“Permissible Medical Experiments.” Trials of War Criminals before the Nuremberg Military Tribunals under Control Council Law No. 10. Nuremberg October 1946 – April 1949, Washington. U.S. Government Printing Office (n.d.), vol. 2., pp. 181-182.


The voluntary consent of the human subject is absolutely essential. This means that the person involved should have legal capacity to give consent; should be situated as to be able to exercise free power of choice, without the intervention of any element of force, fraud, deceit, duress, over-reaching, or other ulterior form of constraint or coercion, and should have sufficient knowledge and comprehension of the elements of the subject matter involved as to enable him to make an understanding and enlightened decision. This latter element requires that before the acceptance of an affirmative decision by the experimental subject there should be made known to him the nature, duration, and purpose of the experiment; the method and means by which it is to be conducted; all inconveniences and hazards reasonably to be expected; and the effects upon his health or person which may possibly come from his participation in the experiment.

The duty and responsibility for ascertaining the quality of the consent rests upon each individual who initiates, directs or engages in the experiment. It is a personal duty and responsibility which may not be delegated to another with impunity.

The experiment should be such as to yield fruitful results for the good of society, unprocurable by other methods or means of study, and not random and unnecessary in nature.

The experiment should be so designed and based on the results of animal experimentation and a knowledge of the natural history of the disease or other problem under study that the anticipated results will justify the performance of the experiment.

The experiment should be so conducted as to avoid all unnecessary physical and mental suffering and injury.

No experiment should be conducted where there is an a priori reason to believe that death or disabling injury will occur; except, perhaps, in those experiments where the experimental physicians also serve as subjects.

The degree of risk to be taken should never exceed that determined by the humanitarian importance of the problem to be solved by the experiment.

Proper preparations should be made and adequate facilities provided to protect the experimental subject against even remote possibilities of injury disability or death.

The experiment should be conducted only by scientifically qualified persons. The highest degree of skill and care should be required through all stages of the experiment of those who conduct or engage in the experiment.

During the course of the experiment the human subject should be at liberty to bring the experiment to an end if he has reached the physical or mental state where continuation of the experiment seems to him to be impossible.


During the course of the experiment the scientist in charge must be prepared to terminate the experiment at any stage, if he has probable cause to believe, in the exercise of the good faith, superior skill and careful judgement required by him that a continuation of the experiment is likely to result in injury, disability, or death to the experimental subject.

Nuremberg 2.0

A team of over 1,000 lawyers and over 10,000 medical experts led by Dr. Reiner Fuellmich have begun legal proceedings against the CDC, WHO & the Davos Group for crimes against humanity.

In addition to the flawed tests and fraudulent death certificates, the “experimental” vaccine itself is in violation of Article 32 of the Geneva Convention. Under Article 32 of the 1949 Geneva Convention IV, “mutilation and medical or scientific experiments not necessitated by the medical treatment of a protected person” are prohibited.


By email

On November 19th, 2021 Action4Canada Chapter Leader Paul Schillaci, along with Bryan Naylor and Rob Shortill, served the Hamilton-Wentworth District School Board Trustees and Superintendents, Notices of Liability. The NOL’s advised the officials of their personal liability if they were to vote in favour of mandating vaccinations for school staff. Paul followed up with an email on Dec. 11th just prior to the School Board voting. As a result, the Board voted 6-3 against mandating vaccination for staff! Read More

Here is a Notice of Liability

Download here:” title=”Notice-of-Liability-Employees-final-web-version-3


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.